Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580043›Full record

ArticleJournal of vision2016

The natural statistics of blur.

William W Sprague, Emily A Cooper, Sylvain Reissier, Baladitya Yellapragada, Martin S Banks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of vision, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Richness of Vision in the Mammalian Brain: Neural Codes for Visual Perception and Behavior in Three Dimensions.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Minimal theory of 3D vision: new approach to visual scale and visual shape.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Ambient Light Regulates Retinal Dopamine Signaling and Myopia Susceptibility.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2021
    Article
  16. The diversified defocus profile of the near-work environment and myopia development.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2020
    Article
  17. Asymmetries in Global Perception Are Represented in Near- versus Far-Preferring Clusters in Human Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  18. Mice Discriminate Stereoscopic Surfaces Without Fixating in Depth.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

William W Sprague
Emily A Cooper
Sylvain Reissier
Baladitya Yellapragada
Martin S Banks

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blur from defocus can be both useful and detrimental for visual perception: It can be useful as a source of depth information and detrimental because it degrades image quality. We examined these aspects of blur by measuring the natural statistics of defocus blur across the visual field. Participants wore an eye-and-scene tracker that measured gaze direction, pupil diameter, and scene distances as they performed everyday tasks. We found that blur magnitude increases with increasing eccentricity. There is a vertical gradient in the distances that generate defocus blur: Blur below the fovea is generally due to scene points nearer than fixation; blur above the fovea is mostly due to points farther than fixation. There is no systematic horizontal gradient. Large blurs are generally caused by points farther rather than nearer than fixation. Consistent with the statistics, participants in a perceptual experiment perceived vertical blur gradients as slanted top-back whereas horizontal gradients were perceived equally as left-back and right-back. The tendency for people to see sharp as near and blurred as far is also consistent with the observed statistics. We calculated how many observations will be perceived as unsharp and found that perceptible blur is rare. Finally, we found that eye shape in ground-dwelling animals conforms to that required to put likely distances in best focus.

Indexed as

AdultContrast SensitivityFixation, OcularFovea CentralisHumansMaleRefractive ErrorsVisual AcuityVisual FieldsVisual PerceptionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27580043
PMCPMC5015925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.