Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27580037›Full record

ArticleNature2016

PionX sites mark the X chromosome for dosage compensation.

Raffaella Villa, Tamas Schauer, Pawel Smialowski, Tobias Straub, Peter B Becker

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Sex-specific transcriptome dynamics ofGenes & development · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. N-terminus ofeLife · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Set2 and H3K36 regulate thebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Sequence reliance of abioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Dosage Compensation inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Dimerization Activity of a Disordered N-Terminal Domain fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Raffaella VillaDivision of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Tamas SchauerDivision of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Pawel SmialowskiBioinformatics Unit, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Tobias StraubBioinformatics Unit, Biomedical Center, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Peter B BeckerDivision of Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center and Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany.
Center for Integrated Protein Science Munich · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rules defining which small fraction of related DNA sequences can be selectively bound by a transcription factor are poorly understood. One of the most challenging tasks in DNA recognition is posed by dosage compensation systems that require the distinction between sex chromosomes and autosomes. In Drosophila melanogaster, the male-specific lethal dosage compensation complex (MSL-DCC) doubles the level of transcription from the single male X chromosome, but the nature of this selectivity is not known. Previous efforts to identify X-chromosome-specific target sequences were unsuccessful as the identified MSL recognition elements lacked discriminative power. Therefore, additional determinants such as co-factors, chromatin features, RNA and chromosome conformation have been proposed to refine targeting further. Here, using an in vitro genome-wide DNA binding assay, we show that recognition of the X chromosome is an intrinsic feature of the MSL-DCC. MSL2, the male-specific organizer of the complex, uses two distinct DNA interaction surfaces-the CXC and proline/basic-residue-rich domains-to identify complex DNA elements on the X chromosome. Specificity is provided by the CXC domain, which binds a novel motif defined by DNA sequence and shape. This motif characterizes a subclass of MSL2-binding sites, which we name PionX (pioneering sites on the X) as they appeared early during the recent evolution of an X chromosome in D. miranda and are the first chromosomal sites to be bound during de novo MSL-DCC assembly. Our data provide the first, to our knowledge, documented molecular mechanism through which the dosage compensation machinery distinguishes the X chromosome from an autosome. They highlight fundamental principles in the recognition of complex DNA elements by protein that will have a strong impact on many aspects of chromosome biology.

Indexed as

Amino Acid MotifsAnimalsBase SequenceBinding SitesDNA-Binding ProteinsDosage Compensation, GeneticDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEvolution, MolecularFemaleGenome, InsectMaleMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsNucleic Acid ConformationNucleotide MotifsDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila Proteinsmsl-2 protein, DrosophilaMultiprotein ComplexesNuclear ProteinsProtein SubunitsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID27580037
OpenAlexW2511911915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.