ReviewJAMA cardiology2016
Potential Strategies to Address the Major Clinical Barriers Facing Stem Cell Regenerative Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Review.
Review in JAMA cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.
- ESC Working Group on Cellular Biology of the Heart: position paper for Cardiovascular Research: tissue engineering strategies combined with cell therapies for cardiac repair in ischaemic heart disease and heart failure.Cardiovascular research · 2019Guideline
- Intramyocardial injection of allogeneic human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in advanced ischemic heart failure: an early-stage randomized trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- The Role and Mechanism of Endothelial Progenitor Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles in Vascular Repair of Ischemic Heart Disease.Journal of cardiovascular translational research · 2026Review
- Intrapericardially injected hydrogel loaded with stromal cell secretome microparticles improves post-infarction myocardial repair in pigs.European heart journal · 2026Article
- Electroactive microneedle augmented stem cell therapy in myocardial infarction.Science advances · 2026Article
- Stem Cells and Their Derivatives in Cardiac Fibrosis Therapy: Challenges and Perspectives.Cells · 2026Review
- Potential of intranasal delivery of human mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles for stroke therapy.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Avenues for optimization of cardiac therapeutics by minimally invasive delivery.Acta biomaterialia · 2026Review
- Cell surface engineering with a pseudofibrotic ECM reprograms the antifibrotic activity of mesenchymal stromal cells.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- In situ mechanostimulation of biohybrid millirobots for enhanced cell functionality and delivery.Science advances · 2026Article
- Therapeutic and Clinical Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cell Secretome for Skin Regeneration.Cells · 2025Review
- Advancements in Stem Cell Research for Effective Therapies Against Alzheimer's Disease: Current Investigation and Future Insight.Molecular neurobiology · 2025Review
- Review
- The regenerative journey: exploring stem cell roles from injury detection to tissue repair.Stem cell research & therapy · 2025Review
- Stem cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- The existing evidence for the use of extracellular vesicles in the treatment of osteoporosis: a review.International journal of surgery (London, England) · 2025Review
- Nanomedicine-based strategies for the treatment of vein graft disease.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2025Review
- Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs): molecular mechanisms of induction and applications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- Microneedle-Mediated Cell Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024Review
21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Although progress continues to be made in the field of stem cell regenerative medicine for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, significant barriers to clinical implementation still exist. Objectives: To summarize the current barriers to the clinical implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and to discuss potential strategies to overcome them. Evidence Review: Information for this review was obtained through a search of PubMed and the Cochrane database for English-language studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 25, 2016. Ten randomized clinical trials and 8 systematic reviews were included. Findings: One of the major clinical barriers facing the routine implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease is the limited and inconsistent benefit observed thus far. Reasons for this finding are unclear but may be owing to poor cell retention and survival, as suggested by numerous preclinical studies and a small number of human studies incorporating imaging to determine cell fate. Additional studies in humans using imaging to determine cell fate are needed to understand how these factors contribute to the limited efficacy of stem cell therapy. Treatment strategies to address poor cell retention and survival are under investigation and include the following: coadministration of immunosuppressive and prosurvival agents, delivery of cardioprotective factors packaged in exosomes rather than the cells themselves, and use of tissue-engineering strategies to provide structural support for cells. If larger grafts are achieved using these strategies, it will be imperative to carefully monitor for the potential risks of tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and arrhythmogenicity. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite important achievements to date, stem cell therapy is not yet ready for routine clinical implementation. Significant research is still needed to address the clinical barriers outlined herein before the next wave of large clinical trials is under way.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.