Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27579998›Full record

ReviewJAMA cardiology2016

Potential Strategies to Address the Major Clinical Barriers Facing Stem Cell Regenerative Therapy for Cardiovascular Disease: A Review.

Patricia K Nguyen, Evgenios Neofytou, June-Wha Rhee, Joseph C Wu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JAMA cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
13.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Stem cell therapies in the clinic.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Microneedle-Mediated Cell Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Patricia K NguyenStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California3Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California.
Evgenios NeofytouStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
June-Wha RheeStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Joseph C WuStanford Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California2Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California4Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Cardiovascular Institute of the South · USStanford University · US

Funding

Elucidating Mechanism of Cardiac Fibrosis with Cell Village of Pooled Human iPSCsR01HL130020 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Ronglih Liao, MARK MERCOLA · 2016 to 2026
$7.3M
Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells for Cardiovascular Disease ModelingR01HL113006 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2012 to 2025
$6.8M
Genome Editing of Human iPSCs to Study Inherited Hypertrophic CardiomyopathyR01HL126527 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI QI, LEI STANLEY, WU, JOSEPH C. · 2015 to 2022
$5.4M
Molecular Imaging of Cardiac Pluripotent Stem CellsR01HL133272 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WU, JOSEPH C. · 2016 to 2020
$2.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113006NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL126527NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL130020NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL133272
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although progress continues to be made in the field of stem cell regenerative medicine for the treatment of cardiovascular disease, significant barriers to clinical implementation still exist. Objectives: To summarize the current barriers to the clinical implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease and to discuss potential strategies to overcome them. Evidence Review: Information for this review was obtained through a search of PubMed and the Cochrane database for English-language studies published between January 1, 2000, and July 25, 2016. Ten randomized clinical trials and 8 systematic reviews were included. Findings: One of the major clinical barriers facing the routine implementation of stem cell therapy in patients with cardiovascular disease is the limited and inconsistent benefit observed thus far. Reasons for this finding are unclear but may be owing to poor cell retention and survival, as suggested by numerous preclinical studies and a small number of human studies incorporating imaging to determine cell fate. Additional studies in humans using imaging to determine cell fate are needed to understand how these factors contribute to the limited efficacy of stem cell therapy. Treatment strategies to address poor cell retention and survival are under investigation and include the following: coadministration of immunosuppressive and prosurvival agents, delivery of cardioprotective factors packaged in exosomes rather than the cells themselves, and use of tissue-engineering strategies to provide structural support for cells. If larger grafts are achieved using these strategies, it will be imperative to carefully monitor for the potential risks of tumorigenicity, immunogenicity, and arrhythmogenicity. Conclusions and Relevance: Despite important achievements to date, stem cell therapy is not yet ready for routine clinical implementation. Significant research is still needed to address the clinical barriers outlined herein before the next wave of large clinical trials is under way.

Indexed as

Cell- and Tissue-Based TherapyStem Cell ResearchCardiovascular DiseasesCell SurvivalHumansMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationRegenerative MedicineStem Cell TransplantationTissue Engineering

Identifiers

PMID27579998
PMCPMC5378463
OpenAlexW2518245761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.