ArticleJournal of managed care & specialty pharmacy2016
Biosimilars: Opportunities to Promote Optimization Through Payer and Provider Collaboration.
Article in Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- The impact of financial incentives promoting biosimilar products in oncology: A quasi-experimental study using administrative data.PloS one · 2024Article
- Practical Strategies for Advanced Practitioners Streamlining the Integration of Oncology Biosimilar Therapies Into Practice.Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology · 2022Review
- Evolving Perceptions, Utilization, and Real-World Implementation Experiences of Oncology Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilars in the USA: Perspectives from Both Payers and Physicians.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2022Article
- Overcoming barriers to biosimilar adoption: real-world perspectives from a national payer and provider initiative.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2021Article
- The Challenges of Switching Therapies in an Evolving Multiple Biosimilars Landscape: A Narrative Review of Current Evidence.Advances in therapy · 2020Review
- Strategies for Overcoming Barriers to Adopting Biosimilars and Achieving Goals of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act: A Survey of Managed Care and Specialty Pharmacy Professionals.Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy · 2019Article
- Biosimilars in the USA: Will New Efforts to Spur Approvals and Access Spur Uptake and Cost Savings?Pharmaceutical medicine · 2019Article
- Biosimilars: Considerations for Payers.P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management · 2019Article
- Policy Options for Infliximab Biosimilars in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Given Emerging Evidence for Switching.Applied health economics and health policy · 2018Article
- The role of biosimilars in value-based oncology care.Cancer management and research · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A panel was convened that consisted of 1 medical director, 2 pharmacy directors, and 2 oncologists, who represented the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Health Plan, an integrated delivery network, and Florida Blue, a progressive regional health plan. This panel met in order to share ideas, discuss challenges, and develop practical solutions to promote optimal utilization in order to encourage collaboration between payers and providers to help ensure the success of biosimilar entrants into the marketplace. Live meetings were conducted in Orlando, Florida, and Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and were followed by virtual meetings to solidify ideas and concepts for this supplement. It is important for biosimilar manufacturers to identify potential payer, provider, and patient obstacles in order to develop strategic and tactical plans to preemptively address these potential obstacles. Gathering payer and provider insights will shed light on various issues such as access and reimbursement. Biosimilar manufacturers must be proactive in the education of payers, providers, and patients to ensure access to biosimilars. A strong factor emphasized among this group was that the assumption surrounding biosimilar development and use is the potential for health care cost savings. According to the panel, payers and providers must carefully consider economic implications and potential cost-effectiveness in order to increase the acceptance or understanding of biosimilars in clinical practice. The group identified 3 major challenges surrounding biosimilar adoption: (1) provider confidence in biosimilar education and clinical value, (2) provider confidence in reimbursement for new biosimilars, and (3) creating shared payer and provider cost-savings. After identification of the 3 challenges, the group posed potential solutions to help with biosimilar adoption.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.