Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27579819›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

A Qualitative Model of the Differentiation Network in Chondrocyte Maturation: A Holistic View of Chondrocyte Hypertrophy.

Johan Kerkhofs, Jeroen Leijten, Johanna Bolander, Frank P Luyten, Janine N Post, Liesbet Geris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. An ECHO of Cartilage:Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2021
    Article
  14. Use of Computational Modeling to Study Joint Degeneration: A Review.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Systems approaches in osteoarthritis: Identifying routes to novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johan KerkhofsBiomechanics Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Jeroen LeijtenPrometheus, the Leuven R&D division of skeletal tissue engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Johanna BolanderPrometheus, the Leuven R&D division of skeletal tissue engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Frank P LuytenPrometheus, the Leuven R&D division of skeletal tissue engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Janine N PostDevelopmental BioEngineering, MIRA Institute for biomedical technology and technical medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Liesbet GerisBiomechanics Research Unit, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.

Funding

European Research Council 279100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Differentiation of chondrocytes towards hypertrophy is a natural process whose control is essential in endochondral bone formation. It is additionally thought to play a role in several pathophysiological processes, with osteoarthritis being a prominent example. We perform a dynamic analysis of a qualitative mathematical model of the regulatory network that directs this phenotypic switch to investigate the influence of the individual factors holistically. To estimate the stability of a SOX9 positive state (associated with resting/proliferation chondrocytes) versus a RUNX2 positive one (associated with hypertrophy) we employ two measures. The robustness of the state in canalisation (size of the attractor basin) is assessed by a Monte Carlo analysis and the sensitivity to perturbations is assessed by a perturbational analysis of the attractor. Through qualitative predictions, these measures allow for an in silico screening of the effect of the modelled factors on chondrocyte maintenance and hypertrophy. We show how discrepancies between experimental data and the model's results can be resolved by evaluating the dynamic plausibility of alternative network topologies. The findings are further supported by a literature study of proposed therapeutic targets in the case of osteoarthritis.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedChondrocytesCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitHumansMiceModels, TheoreticalMonte Carlo MethodOsteoarthritisSOX9 Transcription FactorCore Binding Factor Alpha 1 SubunitSOX9 Transcription Factor

Identifiers

PMID27579819
PMCPMC5007039

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.