Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27578814›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2016

Recent migrants' perspectives on antibiotic use and prescribing in primary care: a qualitative study.

Antje Lindenmeyer, Sabi Redwood, Laura Griffith, Shazia Ahmed, Jenny Phillimore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Knowledge and use of antibiotics in six ethnic groups: the HELIUS study.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antje LindenmeyerInstitute for Applied Health Research.
Sabi RedwoodSchool of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol.
Laura GriffithHealth Services Management Centre.
Shazia AhmedInstitute for Applied Health Research.
Jenny PhillimoreInstitute of Research into Superdiversity, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrently there is great interest in antibiotic prescribing practices in the UK, but little is known about the experiences of the increasing numbers of recent migrants (those present in the UK for >1 year but <5 years) registered at GP practices. Qualitative research has suggested that reasons for not prescribing antibiotics may not be clearly communicated to migrants.

aimThis study aimed to explore the factors that shape migrants' experiences of and attitudes to antibiotics, and to suggest ways to improve effective communication around their use. DESIGN AND

settingA qualitative study on recent migrants' health beliefs, values, and experiences in a community setting in primary care.

methodTwenty-three recent migrants were interviewed in their preferred language by trained community researchers. The research team conducted a thematic analysis, focusing on health beliefs, engaging with health services, transnational medicine, and concepts of fairness. Experiences around antibiotics were a strong emerging theme.

resultsThree reasons were identified for antibiotics seeking: first, holding an 'infectious model' of illness implying that antibiotics are required quickly to avoid illness becoming worse or spreading to others; second, reasoning that other medications will be less effective for people 'used to' antibiotics'; and third, perceiving antibiotic prescription as a sign of being taken seriously. Some participants obtained antibiotics from their country of origin or migrant networks in the UK; others changed their mind and accepted alternatives.

conclusionPrimary care professionals should aim to understand migrants' perspectives to improve communication with patients. Further research is needed to identify different strategies needed to respond to the varying understandings of antibiotics held by migrants.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTransients and MigrantsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCultural CharacteristicsEnglandFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMalePatient Education as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'Qualitative ResearchAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibacterial agentsmigrants and transientsprescriptionsprimary health carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID27578814
PMCPMC5072918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.