ArticleGenetic epidemiology2016
Identifying significant gene-environment interactions using a combination of screening testing and hierarchical false discovery rate control.
Article in Genetic epidemiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cascading effect of early sensory differences on subsequent autistic traits in infants later diagnosed with autism: a prospective cohort study.Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders · 2026Article
- Early sensory differences in toddlers at elevated likelihood for autism and association with later autistic traits: a prospective cohort study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Article
- A guidance of model selection for genomic prediction based on linear mixed models for complex traits.Frontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- SNPxE: SNP-environment interaction pattern identifier.BMC bioinformatics · 2021Article
- A profile and review of findings from the Early Markers for Autism study: unique contributions from a population-based case-control study in California.Molecular autism · 2021Review
- The CXCL Family Contributes to Immunosuppressive Microenvironment in Gliomas and Assists in Gliomas Chemotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2021Article
- Deriving stratified effects from joint models investigating gene-environment interactions.BMC bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Using Genetic Risk Score Approaches to Infer Whether an Environmental Factor Attenuates or Exacerbates the Adverse Influence of a Candidate Gene.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Incorporating spatial-anatomical similarity into the VGWAS framework for AD biomarker detection.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Polygenic approaches to detect gene-environment interactions when external information is unavailable.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2019Review
- Robust identification of gene-environment interactions for prognosis using a quantile partial correlation approach.Genomics · 2019Article
- Performing different kinds of physical exercise differentially attenuates the genetic effects on obesity measures: Evidence from 18,424 Taiwan Biobank participants.PLoS genetics · 2019Article
- A genome-by-environment interaction classifier for precision medicine: personal transcriptome response to rhinovirus identifies children prone to asthma exacerbations.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2017Article
- FGWAS: Functional genome wide association analysis.NeuroImage · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although gene-environment (G× E) interactions play an important role in many biological systems, detecting these interactions within genome-wide data can be challenging due to the loss in statistical power incurred by multiple hypothesis correction. To address the challenge of poor power and the limitations of existing multistage methods, we recently developed a screening-testing approach for G× E interaction detection that combines elastic net penalized regression with joint estimation to support a single omnibus test for the presence of G× E interactions. In our original work on this technique, however, we did not assess type I error control or power and evaluated the method using just a single, small bladder cancer data set. In this paper, we extend the original method in two important directions and provide a more rigorous performance evaluation. First, we introduce a hierarchical false discovery rate approach to formally assess the significance of individual G× E interactions. Second, to support the analysis of truly genome-wide data sets, we incorporate a score statistic-based prescreening step to reduce the number of single nucleotide polymorphisms prior to fitting the first stage penalized regression model. To assess the statistical properties of our method, we compare the type I error rate and statistical power of our approach with competing techniques using both simple simulation designs as well as designs based on real disease architectures. Finally, we demonstrate the ability of our approach to identify biologically plausible SNP-education interactions relative to Alzheimer's disease status using genome-wide association study data from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.