Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27578239›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016

Fold-specific sequence scoring improves protein sequence matching.

Sumudu P Leelananda, Andrzej Kloczkowski, Robert L Jernigan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sumudu P LeelanandaDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, 112 Office and Lab Building, Ames, IA, 50011-3020, USA.
Andrzej KloczkowskiPresent Address: Battelle Center for Mathematical Medicine, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, 43205, USA.
Robert L JerniganDepartment of Biochemistry, Biophysics and Molecular Biology, Iowa State University, 112 Office and Lab Building, Ames, IA, 50011-3020, USA. jernigan@iastate.edu.
Iowa State University · USBattelle · US

Funding

Coarse-Grained Models of ProteinsR01GM072014 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI JERNIGAN, ROBERT L · 2004 to 2012
$2.3M
High-Accuracy Protein Models Derived from Lower Resolution DataR01GM081680 · NIGMS · IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KLOCZKOWSKI, ANDRZEJ · 2007 to 2009
$763k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072014NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081680
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSequence matching is extremely important for applications throughout biology, particularly for discovering information such as functional and evolutionary relationships, and also for discriminating between unimportant and disease mutants. At present the functions of a large fraction of genes are unknown; improvements in sequence matching will improve gene annotations. Universal amino acid substitution matrices such as Blosum62 are used to measure sequence similarities and to identify distant homologues, regardless of the structure class. However, such single matrices do not take into account important structural information evident within the different topologies of proteins and treats substitutions within all protein folds identically. Others have suggested that the use of structural information can lead to significant improvements in sequence matching but this has not yet been very effective. Here we develop novel substitution matrices that include not only general sequence information but also have a topology specific component that is unique for each CATH topology. This novel feature of using a combination of sequence and structure information for each protein topology significantly improves the sequence matching scores for the sequence pairs tested. We have used a novel multi-structure alignment method for each homology level of CATH in order to extract topological information.

resultsWe obtain statistically significant improved sequence matching scores for 73 % of the alpha helical test cases. On average, 61 % of the test cases showed improvements in homology detection when structure information was incorporated into the substitution matrices. On average z-scores for homology detection are improved by more than 54 % for all cases, and some individual cases have z-scores more than twice those obtained using generic matrices. Our topology specific similarity matrices also outperform other traditional similarity matrices and single matrix based structure methods. When default amino acid substitution matrix in the Psi-blast algorithm is replaced by our structure-based matrices, the structure matching is significantly improved over conventional Psi-blast. It also outperforms results obtained for the corresponding HMM profiles generated for each topology.

conclusionsWe show that by incorporating topology-specific structure information in addition to sequence information into specific amino acid substitution matrices, the sequence matching scores and homology detection are significantly improved. Our topology specific similarity matrices outperform other traditional similarity matrices, single matrix based structure methods, also show improvement over conventional Psi-blast and HMM profile based methods in sequence matching. The results support the discriminatory ability of the new amino acid similarity matrices to distinguish between distant homologs and structurally dissimilar pairs.

Indexed as

Structural Homology, ProteinAlgorithmsAmino Acid SubstitutionProtein Structure, SecondarySequence Analysis, ProteinBlosom62CATH topologiesDistant homologiesHMMProtein fold familiesPsi-blastSequence matchingStructure alignment

Identifiers

PMID27578239
PMCPMC5006591
OpenAlexW2511674064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.