Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27578233›Full record

Observational studyWorld journal of urology2017

Optimised photodynamic diagnosis for transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) in German clinical practice: results of the noninterventional study OPTIC III.

Thorsten Bach, Patrick J Bastian, Andreas Blana, Angelika Kaminsky, Stefan Keller, Thomas Knoll, Christoph Lang, Soeren Promnitz, Burkhard Ubrig, Thomas Keller and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in World journal of urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Shedding Light on Bladder Cancer Diagnosis in Urine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Enhanced Endoscopy in Bladder Cancer.Current urology reports · 2018
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Thorsten BachUrologisches Zentrum Hamburg, Asklepios Kliniken Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Patrick J BastianKlinik für Urologie, Marien Hospital, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Andreas BlanaKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany.
Angelika KaminskyKlinik für Urologie, Kliniken Maria Hilf GmbH Mönchengladbach, Mönchengladbach, Germany.
Stefan KellerKlinikum Garmisch-Partenkirchen GmbH, Urologie, Garmisch-Partenkirchen, Germany.
Thomas KnollUrologische Klinik Sindelfingen, Sindelfingen, Germany.
Christoph LangKlinik für Urologie, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Sulzbach, Sulzbach, Germany.
Soeren PromnitzKlinik für Urologie, Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder), Frankfurt, Germany.
Burkhard UbrigKlinik für Urologie, Augusta-Krankenanstalt GmbH, Bochum, Germany.
Thomas KellerACOMED Statistik Leipzig/Mediveritas GmbH München, Munich, Germany.
Bryan QvickIpsen Pharma GmbH, Ettlingen, Germany.
Maximilian BurgerKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, 93053, Regensburg, Germany. mburger@caritasstjosef.de.
OPTIC III Study Group
Kliniken Maria Hilf · DEKnappschaftsklinikum Saar · DEMarien Hospital Düsseldorf · DEUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEAsklepios Kliniken Hamburg · DEAugusta-Kranken-Anstalt · DEIpsen (Germany) · DEKlinikum Frankfurt Höchst · DEKlinikum Sindelfingen-Böblingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhite light cystoscopy (WLC) is the standard procedure for visualising non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). However, WLC can fail to detect all cancerous lesions, and outcomes with transurethral resection of the bladder differ between institutions, controlled trials, and possibly between trials and routine application. This noninterventional study assessed the benefit of hexaminolevulinate blue light cystoscopy (HALC; Hexvix

methodsFrom May 2013 to April 2014, 403 patients with suspected NMIBC were screened from 30 German centres to perform an unprecedented detailed assessment of the additional detection of cancer lesions with HALC versus WLC alone.

resultsAmong the histological results for 929 biopsy samples, 94.3 % were obtained from suspected cancerous lesions under either WLC or HALC: 59.5 % were carcinoma tissue and 40.5 % were non-cancerous tissue. Of all cancer lesions, 62.2 % were staged as Ta, 20.1 % as T1, 9.3 % as T2, 7.3 % as carcinoma in situ (CIS), and 1.2 % were unknown. Additional cancer lesions (+6.8 %) and CIS lesions (+25 %, p < 0.0001) were detected by HALC plus WLC versus WLC alone. In 10.0 % of patients, ≥1 additional positive lesion was detected with HALC, and 2.2 % of NMIBC patients would have been missed with WLC alone. No adverse events were observed.

conclusionsThe results of this study demonstrate that HALC significantly improves the detection of NMIBC versus WLC alone in routine clinical practice in Germany. While this benefit is statistically significant across all types of NMIBC, it seems most relevant in CIS.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAminolevulinic AcidCarcinoma in SituCarcinoma, Transitional CellCystoscopyFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedMuscle, SmoothNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessNeoplasm StagingPhotosensitizing Agents5-aminolevulinic acid hexyl esterAminolevulinic AcidPhotosensitizing AgentsBlue light cystoscopyHexaminolevulinateNon-muscle invasive bladder cancerObservational studiesWhite light cystoscopy

Identifiers

PMID27578233
PMCPMC5397437
OpenAlexW2510155839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.