Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27578045›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology2017

Cam deformity and the omega angle, a novel quantitative measurement of femoral head-neck morphology: a 3D CT gender analysis in asymptomatic subjects.

Vasco V Mascarenhas, Paulo Rego, Pedro Dantas, Augusto Gaspar, Francisco Soldado, José G Consciência

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MRI-based synthetic CT shows equivalence to conventional CT for the morphological assessment of the hip joint.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Advances in FAI Imaging: a Focused Review.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Vasco V MascarenhasMSK imaging Unit (UIME), Imaging Center, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal. mascarenhas.vasco@gmail.com.
Paulo RegoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Pedro DantasHospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.
Augusto GasparMSK imaging Unit (UIME), Imaging Center, Hospital da Luz, Lisbon, Portugal.
Francisco SoldadoHospital Sant Joan De Deu, Universitat De Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
José G ConsciênciaNOVA Medical School, Campo Mártires Pátria, Lisbon, Portugal.
Hospital da Luz · PTHospital CUF DescobertasHospital Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona · ESUniversidade Nova de Lisboa · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOur objectives were to use 3D computed tomography (CT) to define head-neck morphologic gender-specific and normative parameters in asymptomatic individuals and use the omega angle (Ω°) to provide quantification data on the location and radial extension of a cam deformity.

methodsWe prospectively included 350 individuals and evaluated 188 asymptomatic hips that underwent semiautomated CT analysis. Different thresholds of alpha angle (α°) were considered in order to analyze cam morphology and determine Ω°. We calculated overall and gender-specific parameters for imaging signs of cam morphology (Ω° and circumferential α°).

resultsThe 95 % reference interval limits were beyond abnormal thresholds found in the literature for cam morphology. Specifically, α° at 3/1 o´clock were 46.9°/60.8° overall, 51.8°/65.4° for men and 45.7°/55.3° for women. Cam prevalence, magnitude, location, and epicenter were significantly gender different. Increasing α° correlated with higher Ω°, meaning that higher angles correspond to larger cam deformities.

conclusionHip morphometry measurements in this cohort of asymptomatic individuals extended beyond current thresholds used for the clinical diagnosis of cam deformity, and α° was found to vary both by gender and measurement location. These results suggest that α° measurement is insufficient for the diagnosis of cam deformity. Enhanced morphometric evaluation, including 3D imaging and Ω°, may enable a more accurate diagnosis. KEY POINTS: • 95% reference interval limits of cam morphotype were beyond currently defined thresholds. • Current morphometric definitions for cam-type morphotype should be applied with care. • Cam prevalence, magnitude, location, and epicenter are significantly gender different. • Cam and alpha angle thresholds should be defined according to sex/location. • Quantitative 3D morphometric assessment allows thorough and reproducible FAI diagnosis and monitoring.

Indexed as

AdultAsymptomatic DiseasesFemaleFemoracetabular ImpingementFemurFemur HeadFemur NeckHip JointHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleMultidetector Computed TomographyPrevalenceProspective StudiesReference ValuesSex FactorsFemoroacetabular impingementHipMultidetector computed tomographyReference valueVariant

Identifiers

PMID27578045
OpenAlexW2513799469

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.