Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27577691›Full record

ArticleHeredity2017

Colour ornamentation in the blue tit: quantitative genetic (co)variances across sexes.

A Charmantier, M E Wolak, A Grégoire, A Fargevieille, C Doutrelant

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Made-up mouths with preen oil reveal genetic and phenotypic conditions of starling nestlings.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

A CharmantierCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5175 Campus CNRS, Montpellier, France.
M E WolakInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, Zoology Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland.
A GrégoireCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5175 Campus CNRS, Montpellier, France.
A FargevieilleCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5175 Campus CNRS, Montpellier, France.
C DoutrelantCentre d'Ecologie Fonctionnelle et Evolutive, Université de Montpellier, UMR 5175 Campus CNRS, Montpellier, France.

Funding

European Research Council 337365
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although secondary sexual traits are commonly more developed in males than females, in many animal species females also display elaborate ornaments or weaponry. Indirect selection on correlated traits in males and/or direct sexual or social selection in females are hypothesized to drive the evolution and maintenance of female ornaments. Yet, the relative roles of these evolutionary processes remain unidentified, because little is known about the genetic correlation that might exist between the ornaments of both sexes, and few estimates of sex-specific autosomal or sex-linked genetic variances are available. In this study, we used two wild blue tit populations with 9 years of measurements on two colour ornaments: one structurally based (blue crown) and one carotenoid based (yellow chest). We found significant autosomal heritability for the chromatic part of the structurally based colouration in both sexes, whereas carotenoid chroma was heritable only in males, and the achromatic part of both colour patches was mostly non heritable. Power limitations, which are probably common among most data sets collected so far in wild populations, prevented estimation of sex-linked genetic variance. Bivariate analyses revealed very strong cross-sex genetic correlations in all heritable traits, although the strength of these correlations was not related to the level of sexual dimorphism. In total, our results suggest that males and females share a majority of their genetic variation underlying colour ornamentation, and hence the evolution of these sex-specific traits may depend greatly on correlated responses to selection in the opposite sex.

Indexed as

Selection, GeneticSex CharacteristicsAnimalsBiological EvolutionColorFeathersFemaleInheritance PatternsMaleModels, GeneticPasseriformesPigmentation

Identifiers

PMID27577691
PMCPMC5234477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.