Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27577684›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Intron retention-dependent gene regulation in Cryptococcus neoformans.

Sara Gonzalez-Hilarion, Damien Paulet, Kyung-Tae Lee, Chung-Chau Hon, Pierre Lechat, Estelle Mogensen, Frédérique Moyrand, Caroline Proux, Rony Barboux, Giovanni Bussotti and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara Gonzalez-HilarionInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie des ARN des Pathogènes Fongiques, Département de Mycologie, F-75015, Paris, France.
Damien PauletInstitut Pasteur, Plate-forme transcriptome et Epigénome, Département Génomes et Génétique, F-75015, Paris, France.
Kyung-Tae LeeDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Life and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Chung-Chau HonRIKEN Center for Life Science Technologies, Yokohama Institute, Division of Genomic Technology, Yokohama, 230-0045, Japan.
Pierre LechatInstitut Pasteur, HUB Bioinformatique et Biostatistique, C3BI, USR 3756 IP CNRS, F-75015, Paris, France.
Estelle MogensenInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie des ARN des Pathogènes Fongiques, Département de Mycologie, F-75015, Paris, France.
Frédérique MoyrandInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie des ARN des Pathogènes Fongiques, Département de Mycologie, F-75015, Paris, France.
Caroline ProuxInstitut Pasteur, Plate-forme transcriptome et Epigénome, Département Génomes et Génétique, F-75015, Paris, France.
Rony BarbouxInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie des ARN des Pathogènes Fongiques, Département de Mycologie, F-75015, Paris, France.
Giovanni BussottiInstitut Pasteur, HUB Bioinformatique et Biostatistique, C3BI, USR 3756 IP CNRS, F-75015, Paris, France.
Jungwook HwangGraduate School of Biomedical Science and Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Jean-Yves CoppéeInstitut Pasteur, Plate-forme transcriptome et Epigénome, Département Génomes et Génétique, F-75015, Paris, France.
Yong-Sun BahnDepartment of Biotechnology, College of Life and Biotechnology, Yonsei University, Seoul 03722, Korea.
Guilhem JanbonInstitut Pasteur, Unité Biologie des ARN des Pathogènes Fongiques, Département de Mycologie, F-75015, Paris, France.
Institut Pasteur · FRYonsei University · KRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRHanyang University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The biological impact of alternative splicing is poorly understood in fungi, although recent studies have shown that these microorganisms are usually intron-rich. In this study, we re-annotated the genome of C. neoformans var. neoformans using RNA-Seq data. Comparison with C. neoformans var. grubii revealed that more than 99% of ORF-introns are in the same exact position in the two varieties whereas UTR-introns are much less evolutionary conserved. We also confirmed that alternative splicing is very common in C. neoformans, affecting nearly all expressed genes. We also observed specific regulation of alternative splicing by environmental cues in this yeast. However, alternative splicing does not appear to be an efficient method to diversify the C. neoformans proteome. Instead, our data suggest the existence of an intron retention-dependent mechanism of gene expression regulation that is not dependent on NMD. This regulatory process represents an additional layer of gene expression regulation in fungi and provides a mechanism to tune gene expression levels in response to any environmental modification.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, FungalIntronsAlternative SplicingCryptococcus neoformansFungal ProteinsGene ExpressionGenome, FungalMolecular Sequence AnnotationProteomeRNA StabilityFungal ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID27577684
PMCPMC5006051
OpenAlexW2514613565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.