Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27577576›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2016

Recombinase polymerase amplification combined with a lateral flow dipstick for rapid and visual detection of Schistosoma japonicum.

Kui Sun, Weiwei Xing, Xinling Yu, Wenliang Fu, Yuanyuan Wang, Minji Zou, Zhihong Luo, Donggang Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
8.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kui SunBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Weiwei XingBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Xinling YuThe key laboratory of Immune and Control of Schistosomiasis, Hunan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Wenliang FuBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Yuanyuan WangBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Minji ZouBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Zhihong LuoThe key laboratory of Immune and Control of Schistosomiasis, Hunan Institute of Parasitic Diseases, Hunan, People's Republic of China.
Donggang XuBeijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, People's Republic of China. xudg@bmi.ac.cn.
Institute of Basic Medical Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Medical SciencesJiangsu Institute of Parasitic Diseases · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the continuous decline in prevalence and intensity of Schistosoma japonicum infection in China, more accurate and sensitive methods suitable for field detection become much needed for schistosomiasis control. Here, a novel rapid and visual detection method based on the combination of recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) and lateral flow dipstick (LFD) was developed to detect S. japonicum DNA in fecal samples.

resultsThe LFD-RPA assay targeting SjR2 could detect 5 fg S. japonicum DNA, which was identical to qPCR and real-time RPA assay, and showed no cross-reaction with other parasites. The detection could be finished within 15-20 min at a wide temperature range (25-45 °C), and the results could be visualized by naked eye. The diagnostic validity of LFD-RPA assay was further assessed with 14 fecal samples of infected patients diagnosed by Kato-Katz method and 31 fecal samples of healthy persons, and compared with that of Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELSIA) and Indirect Hemagglutination Assay (IHA). The LFD-RPA assay showed 92.68 % sensitivity, 100 % specificity and excellent diagnostic agreement with the gold standard Kato-Katz test (k = 0.947, Z = 6.36, P < 0.001), whereas ELISA showed 85.71 % sensitivity, 93.55 % specificity, and substantial diagnostic agreement (k = 0.793, Z = 5.31, P < 0.001), and IHA showed 78.57 % sensitivity, 83.87 % specificity, and moderate diagnostic agreement (k = 0.600, Z = 4.05, P < 0.001), indicating that the LFD-RPA was much better than the traditional methods.

conclusionsThe LFD-RPA assay established by us is a sensitive, specific, rapid and convenient method for the diagnosis of schistosomiasis, and shows a great potency in field application.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, HelminthHumansNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesPoint-of-Care SystemsPolymerase Chain ReactionRecombinasesSchistosoma japonicumSchistosomiasis japonicaSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, HelminthRecombinasesField applicationLateral flow dipstickRecombinase polymerase amplificationSchistosoma japonicumVisual detection

Identifiers

PMID27577576
PMCPMC5006264
OpenAlexW2513685684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.