ArticleBMC genomics2016
A new look at the LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Host Factors Promoting the LTR Retrotransposon Life Cycle in Plant Cells: Current Knowledge and Future Directions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- A review of genetic variation underlying chicken phenotypic diversity.Poultry science · 2025Review
- Fine-Scale Map Reveals Highly Variable Recombination Rates Associated with Genomic Features in the Eurasian Blackcap.Genome biology and evolution · 2024Article
- Avian Leukosis: Will We Be Able to Get Rid of It?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Activation of lnc-ALVE1-AS1 inhibited ALV-J replication through triggering the TLR3 pathway in chicken macrophage like cell line.Veterinary research communications · 2023Article
- Short communication: diversity of endogenous avian leukosis virus subgroup E elements in 11 chicken breeds.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Dinosaurs: Comparative Cytogenomics of Their Reptile Cousins and Avian Descendants.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Review
- Article
- Transcript- and annotation-guided genome assembly of the European starling.Molecular ecology resources · 2022Article
- Advances on genetic and genomic studies of ALV resistance.Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2022Review
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- Endogenous avian leukosis virus subgroup E elements of the chicken reference genome.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Diversity of endogenous avian leukosis virus subgroup E (ALVE) insertions in indigenous chickens.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2020Article
- The quail genome: insights into social behaviour, seasonal biology and infectious disease response.BMC biology · 2020Article
- Time lapse: A glimpse into prehistoric genomics.European journal of medical genetics · 2020Review
- Identification and characterisation of endogenous Avian Leukosis Virus subgroup E (ALVE) insertions in chicken whole genome sequencing data.Mobile DNA · 2020Article
- Reprogramming of Retrotransposon Activity during Speciation of the Genus Citrus.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
- The Genome of Blue-Capped Cordon-Bleu Uncovers Hidden Diversity of LTR Retrotransposons in Zebra Finch.Genes · 2019Article
- Whole-Genome Analysis of Domestic Chicken Selection Lines Suggests Segregating Variation in ERV Makeups.Genes · 2019Article
- A compendium of conserved cleavage and polyadenylation events in mammalian genes.Genome research · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLTR retrotransposons contribute approximately 10 % of the mammalian genome, but it has been previously reported that there is a deficit of these elements in the chicken relative to both mammals and other birds. A novel LTR retrotransposon classification pipeline, LocaTR, was developed and subsequently utilised to re-examine the chicken LTR retrotransposon annotation, and determine if the proposed chicken deficit is biologically accurate or simply a technical artefact.
resultsUsing LocaTR 3.01 % of the chicken galGal4 genome assembly was annotated as LTR retrotransposon-derived elements (nearly double the previous annotation), including 1,073 that were structurally intact. Element distribution is significantly correlated with chromosome size and is non-random within each chromosome. Elements are significantly depleted within coding regions and enriched in gene sparse areas of the genome. Over 40 % of intact elements are found in clusters, unrelated by age or genera, generally in poorly recombining regions. The transcription of most LTR retrotransposons were suppressed or incomplete, but individual domain and full length retroviral transcripts were produced in some cases, although mostly with regularly interspersed stop codons in all reading frames. Furthermore, RNAseq data from 23 diverse tissues enabled greater characterisation of the co-opted endogenous retrovirus Ovex1. This gene was shown to be expressed ubiquitously but at variable levels across different tissues. LTR retrotransposon content was found to be very variable across the avian lineage and did not correlate with either genome size or phylogenetic position. However, the extent of previous, species-specific LTR retrotransposon annotation appears to be a confounding factor.
conclusionsUse of the novel LocaTR pipeline has nearly doubled the annotated LTR retrotransposon content of the chicken genome compared to previous estimates. Further analysis has described element distribution, clustering patterns and degree of expression in a variety of adult tissues, as well as in three embryonic stages. This study also enabled better characterisation of the co-opted gamma retroviral envelope gene Ovex1. Additionally, this work suggests that there is no deficit of LTR retrotransposons within the Galliformes relative to other birds, or to mammalian genomes when scaled for the three-fold difference in genome size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.