ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2016
Measuring progress in maternal and newborn health care in Mexico: validating indicators of health system contact and quality of care.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 161 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparability of family planning quality of care measurement tools in low-and-middle income country settings: a systematic review.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Advancing maternal and newborn healthcare measurement: developing quality of care indices for postnatal and small and/or sick newborn care in low- and middle-income countries.Journal of global health · 2025Article
- Levels and determinants of person-centred maternity care among women living in urban informal settlements: evidence from client exit surveys in Nairobi, Lusaka and Ouagadougou.BMJ global health · 2025Article
- Assessment of antenatal care quality in Ethiopia: Facility-based study using service provision assessment data.PloS one · 2025Article
- Barriers to postnatal care utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study of sociodemographic and spatial factors in Mexico City.Frontiers in global women's health · 2025Article
- Assessing the validity of maternal report on breastfeeding counselling in Kosovo's primary health facilities.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Article
- Exploring the accuracy of self-reported maternal and newborn care in select studies from low and middle-income country settings: do respondent and facility characteristics affect measurement?BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- When a Doctor Falls from the Sky: The Impact of Easing Doctor Supply Constraints on Mortality.The American economic review · 2023Article
- Measures to assess quality of postnatal care: A scoping review.PLOS global public health · 2023Article
- Small Area Variation in the Quality of Maternal and Newborn Care in India.JAMA network open · 2022Article
- High coverage but low quality of maternal and newborn health services in the coverage cascade: who is benefitted and left behind in accessing better quality health services in Nepal?Reproductive health · 2022Article
- The RADAR coverage tool: developing a toolkit for rigorous household surveys for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health & nutrition indicators.Global health action · 2022Article
- The association between institutional delivery and neonatal mortality based on the quality of maternal and newborn health system in India.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Ionised and total hypocalcaemia in pregnancy: An analysis of prevalence and risk factors in a resource-limited setting, Cameroon.PloS one · 2022Article
- Towards a harmonised framework for developing quality of care indicators for global health: a scoping review of existing conceptual and methodological practices.BMJ health & care informatics · 2022Article
- Electronic data collection for multi-country, hospital-based, clinical observation of maternal and newborn care: EN-BIRTH study experiences.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
- Chlorhexidine for facility-based umbilical cord care: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
- Count every newborn: EN-BIRTH study improving facility-based coverage and quality measurement in routine information systems.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Birthweight: EN-BIRTH multi-country validation study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe majority of births in Mexico take place in a health facility and are attended by a skilled birth attendant, yet maternal mortality has not declined to anticipated levels. Coverage estimates of skilled attendance and other maternal and newborn interventions often rely on women's self-report through a population-based survey, the accuracy of which is not well established.
methodsWe used a facility-based design to validate women's report of skilled birth attendance, as well as other key elements of maternal, newborn intrapartum, and immediate postnatal care. Women's reports of labor and delivery care were collected by exit interview prior to hospital discharge and were compared against direct observation by a trained third party in a Mexican public hospital (n = 597). For each indicator, validity was assessed at the individual level using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) and at the population level using the inflation factor (IF).
resultsFive of 47 indicators met both validation criteria (AUC > 0.60 and 0.75 < IF < 1.25): urine sample screen, injection or IV medication received during labor, before the birth of the baby (i.e., uterotonic for either induction or augmentation of labor), episiotomy, excessive bleeding, and receipt of blood products. An additional 9 indicators met criteria for the AUC and 18 met criteria for the IF. A skilled attendant indicator had high sensitivity (90.1 %: 95 % CI: 87.1-92.5 %), low specificity (14.0 %: 95 % CI: 5.8-26.7 %) and was suitable for population-level estimation only.
conclusionWomen are able to give valid reports on some aspects of the content of care, although questions regarding the indication for interventions are less likely to be known. Questions that include technical terms or refer to specific time periods tended to have lower response levels. A key aspect of efforts to improve maternal and newborn health requires valid measurement of women's access to maternal and newborn health interventions and the quality of such services. Additional work on improving measurement of population coverage indicators is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.