Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27576873›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2017

A novel 3D human glioblastoma cell culture system for modeling drug and radiation responses.

Natividad Gomez-Roman, Katrina Stevenson, Lesley Gilmour, Graham Hamilton, Anthony J Chalmers

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 86 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
86citing papers in PubMed
8.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

86 citing papers in PubMed, 143 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Understanding Glioblastoma Dynamics Using 3D Organoids and Engineered Extracellular Matrix.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

26 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Natividad Gomez-RomanWolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Center, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Katrina StevensonWolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Center, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Lesley GilmourWolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Center, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Graham HamiltonWolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Center, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Anthony J ChalmersWolfson Wohl Translational Cancer Research Center, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
Cancer Research Center · USUniversity of Glasgow · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office ETM/405
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary brain tumor, with dismal prognosis. The failure of drug-radiation combinations with promising preclinical data to translate into effective clinical treatments may relate to the use of simplified 2-dimensional in vitro GBM cultures. Methods: We developed a customized 3D GBM culture system based on a polystyrene scaffold (Alvetex) that recapitulates key histological features of GBM and compared it with conventional 2D cultures with respect to their response to radiation and to molecular targeted agents for which clinical data are available. Results: In 3 patient-derived GBM lines, no difference in radiation sensitivity was observed between 2D and 3D cultures, as measured by clonogenic survival. Three different molecular targeted agents, for which robust clinical data are available were evaluated in 2D and 3D conditions: (i) temozolomide, which improves overall survival and is standard of care for GBM, exhibited statistically significant effects on clonogenic survival in both patient-derived cell lines when evaluated in the 3D model compared with only one cell line in 2D cells; (ii) bevacizumab, which has been shown to increase progression-free survival when added to standard chemoradiation in phase III clinical trials, exhibited marked radiosensitizing activity in our 3D model but had no effect on 2D cells; and (iii) erlotinib, which had no efficacy in clinical trials, displayed no activity in our 3D GBM model, but radiosensitized 2D cells. Conclusions: Our 3D model reliably predicted clinical efficacy, strongly supporting its clinical relevance and potential value in preclinical evaluation of drug-radiation combinations for GBM.

Indexed as

Drug DesignRadiotherapyAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsApoptosisBrain NeoplasmsCell Culture TechniquesCell ProliferationGlioblastomaHumansMiceMice, NudeRadiation-Sensitizing AgentsSpheroids, CellularTumor Cells, CulturedXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntineoplastic AgentsRadiation-Sensitizing Agentserlotinibglioblastomaglioma stemlike cellsionizing radiationthree-dimensionalVEGF

Identifiers

PMID27576873
PMCPMC5463789
OpenAlexW2516260138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.