ArticleScientific reports2016
Post-response βγ power predicts the degree of choice-based learning in internally guided decision-making.
Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Internally Formed Preferences for Options only Influence Initial Decisions in Gambling Tasks, while the Gambling Outcomes do not Alter these Preferences.Journal of gambling studies · 2025Article
- Externally Provided Rewards Increase Internal Preference, but Not as Much as Preferred Ones Without Extrinsic Rewards.Computational brain & behavior · 2025Article
- The more random people's preference judgments are, the more they explore in gambling tasks.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Active reinforcement learning versus action bias and hysteresis: control with a mixture of experts and nonexperts.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Neurochronometry of choice-induced preference changes: when do preferences actually change?Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Are you confident enough to act? Individual differences in action control are associated with post-decisional metacognitive bias.PloS one · 2022Article
- Augmenting Human Selves Through Artificial Agents - Lessons From the Brain.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Choice perseverance underlies pursuing a hard-to-get target in an avatar choice task.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Dissociation between asymmetric value updating and perseverance in human reinforcement learning.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Computational modeling of choice-induced preference change: A Reinforcement-Learning-based approach.PloS one · 2021Article
- Article
- The temporal signature of self: Temporal measures of resting-state EEG predict self-consciousness.Human brain mapping · 2019Article
- Why is the environment important for decision making? Local reservoir model for choice-based learning.PloS one · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Choosing an option increases a person's preference for that option. This phenomenon, called choice-based learning (CBL), has been investigated separately in the contexts of internally guided decision-making (IDM, e.g., preference judgment), for which no objectively correct answer exists, and externally guided decision making (EDM, e.g., perceptual decision making), for which one objectively correct answer exists. For the present study, we compared decision making of these two types to examine differences of underlying neural processes of CBL. As IDM and EDM tasks, occupation preference judgment and salary judgment were used, respectively. To compare CBL for the two types of decision making, we developed a novel measurement of CBL: decision consistency. When CBL occurs, decision consistency is higher in the last-half trials than in first-half trials. Electroencephalography (EEG) data have demonstrated that the change of decision consistency is positively correlated with the fronto-central beta-gamma power after response in the first-half trials for IDM, but not for EDM. Those results demonstrate for the first time the difference of CBL between IDM and EDM. The fronto-central beta-gamma power is expected to reflect a key process of CBL, specifically for IDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.