Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27576572›Full record

ArticleBMC systems biology2016

Analyzing negative feedback using a synthetic gene network expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo.

Ashley A Jermusyk, Nicholas P Murphy, Gregory T Reeves

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC systems biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ashley A JermusykDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27606, USA.
Nicholas P MurphyDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Virginia, 102 Engineers' Way, Charlottesville, USA.
Gregory T ReevesDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, 27606, USA. gtreeves@ncsu.edu.
North Carolina State University · USUniversity of Virginia · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA complex network of gene interactions controls gene regulation throughout development and the life of the organisms. Insights can be made into these processes by studying the functional interactions (or "motifs") which make up these networks.

resultsWe sought to understand the functionality of one of these network motifs, negative feedback, in a multi-cellular system. This was accomplished using a synthetic network expressed in the Drosophila melanogaster embryo using the yeast proteins Gal4 (a transcriptional activator) and Gal80 (an inhibitor of Gal4 activity). This network is able to produce an attenuation or shuttling phenotype depending on the Gal80/Gal4 ratio. This shuttling behavior was validated by expressing Gal3, which inhibits Gal80, to produce a localized increase in free Gal4 and therefore signaling. Mathematical modeling was used to demonstrate the capacity for negative feedback to produce these varying outputs.

conclusionsThe capacity of a network motif to exhibit different phenotypes due to minor changes to the network in multi-cellular systems was shown. This work demonstrates the importance of studying network motifs in multi-cellular systems.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyFeedback, PhysiologicalGene Regulatory NetworksAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterEmbryo, NonmammalianGene ExpressionModels, GeneticSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCanalizationNegative feedbackShuttlingSynthetic gene networks

Identifiers

PMID27576572
PMCPMC5006508
OpenAlexW2511617859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.