ArticleGenome biology and evolution2016
CRISPR Diversity and Microevolution in Clostridium difficile.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genomic and phenotypic insight intoEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Enhanced editing ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- Removal of mobile genetic elements from the genome ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Analysis of CRISPR/Cas Genetic Structure, Spacer Content and Molecular Epidemiology in BrazilianPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Novel ribotype/sequence type associations and diverse CRISPR-Cas systems in environmental Clostridioides difficile strains from northern Iraq.FEMS microbiology letters · 2023Article
- Article
- Genome Sequence Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- First Comparative Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Comparative Genomic Analyses and CRISPR-Cas Characterization ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Exploration of the Diversity of Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats-Cas Systems inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- Article
- Host and body site-specific adaptation ofNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Microevolution within ST11 group Clostridioides difficile isolates through mobile genetic elements based on complete genome sequencing.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- Using an Endogenous CRISPR-Cas System for Genome Editing in the Human Pathogen Clostridium difficile.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2019Article
- Diversity of CRISPR/Cas system in Clostridium perfringens.Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG · 2019Article
- CRISPR Visualizer: rapid identification and visualization of CRISPR loci via an automated high-throughput processing pipeline.RNA biology · 2019Article
- Article
- Selective Maintenance of Multiple CRISPR Arrays Across Prokaryotes.The CRISPR journal · 2018Article
- Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Virulent strains of Clostridium difficile have become a global health problem associated with morbidity and mortality. Traditional typing methods do not provide ideal resolution to track outbreak strains, ascertain genetic diversity between isolates, or monitor the phylogeny of this species on a global basis. Here, we investigate the occurrence and diversity of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and CRISPR-associated genes (cas) in C. difficile to assess the potential of CRISPR-based phylogeny and high-resolution genotyping. A single Type-IB CRISPR-Cas system was identified in 217 analyzed genomes with cas gene clusters present at conserved chromosomal locations, suggesting vertical evolution of the system, assessing a total of 1,865 CRISPR arrays. The CRISPR arrays, markedly enriched (8.5 arrays/genome) compared with other species, occur both at conserved and variable locations across strains, and thus provide a basis for typing based on locus occurrence and spacer polymorphism. Clustering of strains by array composition correlated with sequence type (ST) analysis. Spacer content and polymorphism within conserved CRISPR arrays revealed phylogenetic relationship across clades and within ST. Spacer polymorphisms of conserved arrays were instrumental for differentiating closely related strains, e.g., ST1/RT027/B1 strains and pathogenicity locus encoding ST3/RT001 strains. CRISPR spacers showed sequence similarity to phage sequences, which is consistent with the native role of CRISPR-Cas as adaptive immune systems in bacteria. Overall, CRISPR-Cas sequences constitute a valuable basis for genotyping of C. difficile isolates, provide insights into the micro-evolutionary events that occur between closely related strains, and reflect the evolutionary trajectory of these genomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.