Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27576473›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of pediatrics2016

Probiotic supplementation in children with cystic fibrosis-a systematic review.

Anitha Ananthan, Haribalakrishna Balasubramanian, Shripada Rao, Sanjay Patole

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Probiotics for people with cystic fibrosis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  4. Paediatrics & child health · 2022
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Brazilian Guidelines for Nutrition in Cystic Fibrosis.Einstein (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Role of the gut microbiota in nutrition and health.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2018
    Review
  14. Diet, Microbiota and Gut-Lung Connection.Frontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anitha AnanthanDepartment of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, 378 Bagot Road, Subiaco, Perth, WA, 6008, Australia. ani.gem81@gmail.com.
Haribalakrishna BalasubramanianDepartment of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, 378 Bagot Road, Subiaco, Perth, WA, 6008, Australia.
Shripada RaoDepartment of Neonatal Paediatrics, Princess Margaret Hospital for Children, Perth, WA, Australia.
Sanjay PatoleDepartment of Neonatal Paediatrics, King Edward Memorial Hospital for Women, 378 Bagot Road, Subiaco, Perth, WA, 6008, Australia.
King Edward Memorial Hospital · AUUniversity of Western Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledProbiotics may benefit in cystic fibrosis (CF) as gut dysbiosis is associated with gastrointestinal symptoms and exacerbation of respiratory symptoms in CF. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs of probiotic supplementation in children with CF, using the Cochrane methodology, preferred reporting items for systematic reviews (PRISMA) statement, and meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines. Primary outcomes were pulmonary exacerbations, duration of hospitalization and antibiotics, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included gastrointestinal symptoms, markers of gut inflammation, and intestinal microbial balance. A total of nine studies (RCTs, 6, non-RCTs, 3; N = 275) with some methodological weaknesses were included in the review. The pooled estimate showed significant reduction in the rate of pulmonary exacerbation (fixed effects model, two parallel group RCTs and one cross-over trial: relative risk (RR) 0.25, (95 % confidence interval (95 % CI) 0.15,0.41); p < 0.00001; level of evidence: low) and decrease in fecal calprotectin (FCLP) levels (fixed effect model, three RCTs: mean difference (MD) -16.71, 95 % CI -27.30,-6.13); p = 0.002; level of evidence: low) after probiotic supplementation. Probiotic supplementation significantly improved gastrointestinal symptoms (one RCT, one non-RCT) and gut microbial balance (decreased Proteobacteria, increased Firmicutes, and Bacteroides in one RCT, one non-RCT).

conclusionLimited low-quality evidence exists on the effects of probiotics in children with CF. Well-designed adequately powered RCTs assessing clinically meaningful outcomes are required to study this important issue. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Gut dysbiosis is frequent in children with cystic fibrosis due to frequent exposure to pathogens and antibiotics. • Probiotics decrease gut dysbiosis and improve gut maturity and function. What is New: • This comprehensive systematic review shows that current evidence on the safety and efficacy of probiotics in children with cystic fibrosis is limited and of low quality. • Well-designed and adequately powered trials assessing clinically important outcomes are required considering the health burden of cystic fibrosis and the potential benefits of probiotics.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeChildCystic FibrosisDietary SupplementsDysbiosisHumansIntestinesNon-Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicProbioticsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicCystic fibrosisFecal calprotectinGut dysbiosisProbioticsPulmonary exacerbation

Identifiers

PMID27576473
OpenAlexW2508157117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.