Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27576271›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics2017

Movements Indicate Threat Response Phases in Children at Risk for Anxiety.

Ellen W McGinnis, Ryan S McGinnis, Maria Muzik, Jessica Hruschak, Nestor L Lopez-Duran, Noel C Perkins, Kate Fitzgerald, Katherine L Rosenblum

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancing Digital Medicine with Wearables in the Wild.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ellen W McGinnis
Ryan S McGinnis
Maria Muzik
Jessica Hruschak
Nestor L Lopez-Duran
Noel C Perkins
Kate Fitzgerald
Katherine L Rosenblum
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MCHR)UL1TR000433 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2012 to 2016
$49.9M
Infant Stress Response: Effects of Maternal PTSD and Infant GenesK23MH080147 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MUZIK, MARIA · 2008 to 2011
$717k
Neurobehavioral assessments of RDoC domains to detect preschool mood disordersR03MH102648 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FITZGERALD, KATE DIMOND, ROSENBLUM, KATHERINE · 2014 to 2015
$167k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000433NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH080147NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH102648
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Temporal phases of threat response, including potential threat (anxiety), acute threat (startle, fear), and post-threat response modulation, have been identified as the underlying markers of anxiety disorders. Objective measures of response during these phases may help identify children at risk for anxiety; however, the complexity of current assessment techniques prevent their adoption in many research and clinical contexts. We propose an alternative technology, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), that enables noninvasive measurement of the movements associated with threat response, and test its ability to detect threat response phases in young children at a heightened risk for developing anxiety. We quantified the motion of 18 children (3-7 years old) during an anxiety-/fear-provoking behavioral task using an IMU. Specifically, measurements from a single IMU secured to the child's waist were used to extract root-mean-square acceleration and angular velocity in the horizontal and vertical directions, and tilt and yaw range of motion during each threat response phase. IMU measurements detected expected differences in child motion by threat phase. Additionally, potential threat motion was positively correlated to familial anxiety risk, startle range of motion was positively correlated with child internalizing symptoms, and response modulation motion was negatively correlated to familial anxiety risk. Results suggest differential theory-driven threat response phases and support previous literature connecting maternal child risk to anxiety with behavioral measures using more feasible objective methods. This is the first study demonstrating the utility of an IMU for characterizing the motion of young children to mark the phases of threat response modulation. The technique provides a novel and objective measure of threat response for mental health researchers.

Indexed as

AnxietyChildChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolFearFemaleHumansMaleMonitoring, PhysiologicMovementRiskSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27576271
PMCPMC5326613
OpenAlexW2511505640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.