Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27576023›Full record

ArticleScientific data2016

Data for evaluation of fast kurtosis strategies, b-value optimization and exploration of diffusion MRI contrast.

Brian Hansen, Sune Nørhøj Jespersen

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. An Introduction to Kurtosis Fractional Anisotropy.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2019
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Brian HansenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.
Sune Nørhøj JespersenCenter of Functionally Integrative Neuroscience (CFIN), Clinical Institute, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark.

Funding

Development of MR Microscopy at the Cellular LevelR01EB012874 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BLACKBAND, STEPHEN J. · 2010 to 2013
$2.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB012874-01NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB012874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we describe and provide diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) data that was acquired in neural tissue and a physical phantom. Data acquired in biological tissue includes: fixed rat brain (acquired at 9.4 T) and spinal cord (acquired at 16.4 T) and in normal human brain (acquired at 3 T). This data was recently used for evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) contrasts and for comparison to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameter contrast. The data has also been used to optimize b-values for ex vivo and in vivo fast kurtosis imaging. The remaining data was obtained in a physical phantom with three orthogonal fiber orientations (fresh asparagus stems) for exploration of the kurtosis fractional anisotropy. However, the data may have broader interest and, collectively, may form the basis for image contrast exploration and simulations based on a wide range of dMRI analysis strategies.

Indexed as

Diffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingDiffusion Tensor ImagingAnimalsAnisotropyBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID27576023
PMCPMC5004585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.