ArticlePloS one2016
Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Admitted to Intensive Care Units: Outcome Analysis and Risk Prediction.
Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dynamic changes in mortality risk factors for acute leukemia patients in the ICU and Post-ICU periods.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Short-term mortality after intensive care admission in acute lymphoblastic versus predominantly acute myeloid leukemia: a retrospective cohort study using MIMIC-IV with eICU external replication.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- When and for Whom Does Intensive Care Unit Admission Change the Prognosis in Oncology?-A Scoping Review.Cancers · 2025Review
- Outcomes of Elderly Patients Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia.European journal of haematology · 2025Article
- Patients admitted in the intensive care unit after solid organ or bone marrow transplantation: Retrospective cohort study.World journal of transplantation · 2025Article
- Outcomes of intracranial hemorrhage in critically ill patients with acute leukemia: Results of a retrospective cohort study.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024Article
- Relationship Between Longitudinal Coping Strategies and Outcomes in Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia.Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN · 2022Article
- A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating Geographical Variation in Outcomes of Cancer Patients Treated in ICUs.Critical care explorations · 2022Review
- Construction of a Prediction Model for the Mortality of Elderly Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Article
- Intensive care unit outcomes in patients with hematological malignancy.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2020Article
- Outcomes for older adults with acute myeloid leukemia after an intensive care unit admission.Cancer · 2019Article
- Correction: Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Admitted to Intensive Care Units: Outcome Analysis and Risk Prediction.PloS one · 2018Article
- Outcomes of Patients with Hematological Malignancies Admitted to the Intensive Care Unit at a Tertiary Care Center in Saudi Arabia.Saudi journal of medicine & medical sciencesArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
23 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis retrospective, multicenter study aimed to reveal risk predictors for mortality in the intensive care unit (ICU) as well as survival after ICU discharge in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requiring treatment in the ICU. METHODS AND
resultsMultivariate analysis of data for 187 adults with AML treated in the ICU in one institution revealed the following as independent prognostic factors for death in the ICU: arterial oxygen partial pressure below 72 mmHg, active AML and systemic inflammatory response syndrome upon ICU admission, and need for hemodialysis and mechanical ventilation in the ICU. Based on these variables, we developed an ICU mortality score and validated the score in an independent cohort of 264 patients treated in the ICU in three additional tertiary hospitals. Compared with the Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II, the Logistic Organ Dysfunction (LOD) score, and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, our score yielded a better prediction of ICU mortality in the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis (AUC = 0.913 vs. AUC = 0.710 [SAPS II], AUC = 0.708 [LOD], and 0.770 [SOFA] in the training cohort; AUC = 0.841 for the developed score vs. AUC = 0.730 [SAPSII], AUC = 0.773 [LOD], and 0.783 [SOFA] in the validation cohort). Factors predicting decreased survival after ICU discharge were as follows: relapse or refractory disease, previous allogeneic stem cell transplantation, time between hospital admission and ICU admission, time spent in ICU, impaired diuresis, Glasgow Coma Scale <8 and hematocrit of ≥25% at ICU admission. Based on these factors, an ICU survival score was created and used for risk stratification into three risk groups. This stratification discriminated distinct survival rates after ICU discharge.
conclusionsOur data emphasize that although individual risks differ widely depending on the patient and disease status, a substantial portion of critically ill patients with AML benefit from intensive care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.