Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27575713›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of gastroenterology2016

A Randomized, Multi-Center, Open-Label Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Carvedilol vs. Propranolol to Reduce Portal Pressure in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis.

Sang G Kim, Tae Y Kim, Joo H Sohn, Soon H Um, Yeon S Seo, Soon K Baik, Moon Y Kim, Jae Y Jang, Soung W Jeong, Bora Lee and 3 more

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Guideline
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CarvedilolJGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2022
    Article
  11. Review
  12. β-blockers in advanced cirrhosis: More friend than enemy.Clinical and molecular hepatology · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [The application of non-selective β-blockers, angiotensin receptor antagonists and statins in liver cirrhotic patients].Zhonghua gan zang bing za zhi = Zhonghua ganzangbing zazhi = Chinese journal of hepatology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Beneficial and harmful effects of nonselective beta blockade on acute kidney injury in liver transplant candidates.Liver transplantation : official publication of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and the International Liver Transplantation Society · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Sang G KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Tae Y KimInstitute of Medical Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Korea.
Joo H SohnDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Guri, Korea.
Soon H UmDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yeon S SeoDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soon K BaikDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Moon Y KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Wonju, Korea.
Jae Y JangDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Soung W JeongDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Bora LeeDepartment of Biostatistic Consulting, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.
Young S KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea.
Ki T SukDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Dong J KimDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea.
Soonchunhyang University · KRHallym University · KRHanyang University · KRKorea University · KRYonsei University · KRBucheon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesPropranolol has been used as prophylaxis for variceal bleeding in patients with cirrhosis. More recent data suggest that carvedilol may be more effective for reducing the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) than propranolol. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the hemodynamic response to carvedilol compared with propranolol.

methodsA total of 110 patients with a baseline HVPG value >12 mm Hg were allocated randomly to receive either carvedilol or propranolol. The HVPG measurement was repeated after 6 weeks of daily medication. The primary end point was a ≥20% fall in HVPG compared with baseline or <12 mm Hg.

resultsThe difference in the proportion of responders in the carvedilol (49.1%) vs. propranolol (30.9%) groups did not reach statistical significance in the intention-to-treat analysis (P=0.08). However, among patients with a model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score ≥15, carvedilol resulted in a significantly greater response than that of propranolol (7/12, 58.3% vs. 0/10, 0%; P=0.005). Similarly, carvedilol was superior to propranolol in patients with Child-Pugh score ≥9 (46.2 vs. 0%; P=0.046). The presence of ascites also had a significant influence on the response rate (51.5 vs. 24.2%; P=0.042). A MELD score ≥15 was the only significant predictor of response among these post hoc groups after adjusting for multiple comparisons (P=0.005). Severe adverse events were higher in the carvedilol group although drug-associated adverse events were not different.

conclusionsOverall, carvedilol offered no clear advantage over propranolol but it may be more effective in advanced cirrhotic patients with a MELD score≥15 in reducing the portal pressure gradient. However, this potential benefit may come with a cost of increased risk of side-effects and outcome data over a longer term is needed to understand the relative risk benefit.

Indexed as

Portal PressureAdultAntihypertensive AgentsAscitesCarbazolesCarvedilolEnd Stage Liver DiseaseEsophageal and Gastric VaricesFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHemodynamicsHepatic VeinsHumansHypertension, PortalLiver CirrhosisLogistic ModelsAntihypertensive AgentsCarbazolesCarvedilolPropanolaminesPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID27575713
OpenAlexW2512291917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.