Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27575375›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2016

Pancreatic Cancer Surgical Resection Margins: Molecular Assessment by Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Livia S Eberlin, Katherine Margulis, Ivette Planell-Mendez, Richard N Zare, Robert Tibshirani, Teri A Longacre, Moe Jalali, Jeffrey A Norton, George A Poultsides

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Intraoperative assessment of tumor margins during glioma resection by desorption electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mass Spectrometry Imaging.Analytical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Livia S EberlinDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Katherine MargulisDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-1454-5469
Ivette Planell-MendezDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-6504-5646
Richard N ZareDepartment of Chemistry, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Robert TibshiraniDepartment of Biomedical Data Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Teri A LongacreDepartment of Pathology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Moe JalaliDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jeffrey A NortonDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
George A PoultsidesDepartment of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

Prognostic Metabolic Signatures of Cancers Through Mass Spectrometry ImagingR01CA184384 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI FELSHER, DEAN W, ZARE, RICHARD N · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
Mass Spectrometry Imaging for Clinical Diagnosis and Prognosis of Human CancersK99CA190783 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SCHIAVINATO EBERLIN, LIVIA · 2015 to 2015
$133k
NHLBI PROTEOMICS INITIATIVE-N01HV28183N01HV028183 · HV · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NOLAN, GARRY P · 2002 to 2006
–
PLATELET INTERACTIONS WITH FIBRINOGEN AND CALCIUMR01HL028183 · NHLBI · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI PEERSCHKE, ELLINOR I · 1985 to 1992
–
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA190783NCI NIH HHS R01 CA184384NHLBI NIH HHS N01 HV028183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurgical resection with microscopically negative margins remains the main curative option for pancreatic cancer; however, in practice intraoperative delineation of resection margins is challenging. Ambient mass spectrometry imaging has emerged as a powerful technique for chemical imaging and real-time diagnosis of tissue samples. We applied an approach combining desorption electrospray ionization mass spectrometry imaging (DESI-MSI) with the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (Lasso) statistical method to diagnose pancreatic tissue sections and prospectively evaluate surgical resection margins from pancreatic cancer surgery. METHODS AND

findingsOur methodology was developed and tested using 63 banked pancreatic cancer samples and 65 samples (tumor and specimen margins) collected prospectively during 32 pancreatectomies from February 27, 2013, to January 16, 2015. In total, mass spectra for 254,235 individual pixels were evaluated. When cross-validation was employed in the training set of samples, 98.1% agreement with histopathology was obtained. Using an independent set of samples, 98.6% agreement was achieved. We used a statistical approach to evaluate 177,727 mass spectra from samples with complex, mixed histology, achieving an agreement of 81%. The developed method showed agreement with frozen section evaluation of specimen margins in 24 of 32 surgical cases prospectively evaluated. In the remaining eight patients, margins were found to be positive by DESI-MSI/Lasso, but negative by frozen section analysis. The median overall survival after resection was only 10 mo for these eight patients as opposed to 26 mo for patients with negative margins by both techniques. This observation suggests that our method (as opposed to the standard method to date) was able to detect tumor involvement at the margin in patients who developed early recurrence. Nonetheless, a larger cohort of samples is needed to validate the findings described in this study. Careful evaluation of the long-term benefits to patients of the use of DESI-MSI for surgical margin evaluation is also needed to determine its value in clinical practice.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence that the molecular information obtained by DESI-MSI/Lasso from pancreatic tissue samples has the potential to transform the evaluation of surgical specimens. With further development, we believe the described methodology could be routinely used for intraoperative surgical margin assessment of pancreatic cancer.

Indexed as

Margins of ExcisionPancreatectomyHumansMolecular ImagingPancreasPancreatic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray Ionization

Identifiers

PMID27575375
PMCPMC5019340

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.