Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27574778›Full record

ArticleTraffic injury prevention2017

Driving self-regulation and ride service utilization in a multicommunity, multistate sample of U.S. older adults.

Donna C Bird, Katherine Freund, Richard H Fortinsky, Loren Staplin, Bethany A West, Gwen Bergen, Jonathan Downs

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Traffic injury prevention, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Navigating the pathway to ceasing driving-A voyage of discovery.International journal of older people nursing · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Driving Status and Transportation Disadvantage Among Medicare Beneficiaries.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Donna C Birda ITNAmerica , Westbrook , Maine.
Katherine Freunda ITNAmerica , Westbrook , Maine.
Richard H Fortinskyb University of Connecticut School of Medicine , Farmington , Connecticut.
Loren Staplinc TransAnalytics, LLC , Quakertown , Pennsylvania.
Bethany A Westd Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, CDC , Atlanta , Georgia.
Gwen Bergend Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, CDC , Atlanta , Georgia.
Jonathan Downsd Division of Unintentional Injury Prevention, CDC , Atlanta , Georgia.

Funding

Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study examined a multicommunity alternative transportation program available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, for any purpose, offering door-through-door service in private automobiles to members who either do not drive or are transitioning away from driving. Specific aims were to describe the characteristics of members by driving status and ride service usage of these members.

methodsData came from administrative records maintained by a nonprofit ride service program and include 2,661 individuals aged 65+ residing in 14 states who joined the program between April 1, 2010, and November 8, 2013. Latent class analysis was used to group current drivers into 3 classes of driving status of low, medium, and high self-regulation, based on their self-reported avoidance of certain driving situations and weekly driving frequency. Demographics and ride service use rate for rides taken through March 31, 2014, by type of ride (e.g., medical, social, etc.) were calculated for nondrivers and drivers in each driving status class.

resultsThe majority of ride service users were female (77%) and aged 65-74 years (82%). The primary method of getting around when enrolling for the transportation service was by riding with a friend or family member (60%). Among the 67,883 rides given, nondrivers took the majority (69%) of rides. Medical rides were the most common, accounting for 40% of all rides.

conclusionsReported ride usage suggests that older adults are willing to use such ride services for a variety of trips when these services are not limited to specific types (e.g., medical). Further research can help tailor strategies to encourage both nondrivers and drivers to make better use of alternative transportation that meets the special needs of older people.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingSelf-ControlSelf ReportAgedAged, 80 and overAutomobile DrivingAutomobilesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesagingDrivingmobilitymotor vehicleolder adultolder driverself-regulationsenior transportation

Identifiers

PMID27574778
PMCPMC6066175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.