Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27574577›Full record

ArticleIEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine2016

A Smart-Home System to Unobtrusively and Continuously Assess Loneliness in Older Adults.

Johanna Austin, Hiroko H Dodge, Thomas Riley, Peter G Jacobs, Stephen Thielke, Jeffrey Kaye

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02566239 (Ambient Independence Measures for Guiding Care Transitions), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02566239 nacompletednot on this map

Ambient Independence Measures for Guiding Care Transitions

TypeinterventionalSponsorOregon Health and Science UniversityRan2014 to 2019Enrolled96ConditionsAgingArmsShare activity data with care team
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Qualitative exploration of the lived experiences of loneliness in later life to inform technology development.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. In-Home Monitoring Technology for Aging in Place: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Johanna AustinOregon Center for Aging and Technology Department of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR 97239 USA.
Hiroko H DodgeOregon Center for Aging and Technology Department of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR 97239 USA.
Thomas RileyOregon Center for Aging and Technology Department of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR 97239 USA.
Peter G JacobsDepartment of Biomedical Engineering Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR 97239 USA.
Stephen ThielkeDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral SciencesUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWA98102USA; Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical CenterSeattle VA Medical CenterSeattleWA98108USA.
Jeffrey KayeOregon Center for Aging and Technology Department of Neurology Oregon Health & Science University Portland OR 97239 USA.

Funding

Outreach, Recruitment and Education CoreP30AG008017 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI DODGE, HIROKO HAYAMA · 1990 to 2019
$27.7M
Pilot CoreP30AG024978 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 2004 to 2023
$9.0M
Ambient Independence Measures for Guiding Care TransitionsR01AG042191 · NIA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KAYE, JEFFREY A · 2013 to 2017
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS P30 AG008017NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024978NIA NIH HHS R01 AG042191
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness is a common condition in older adults and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, decreased sleep quality, and increased risk of cognitive decline. Assessing loneliness in older adults is challenging due to the negative desirability biases associated with being lonely. Thus, it is necessary to develop more objective techniques to assess loneliness in older adults. In this paper, we describe a system to measure loneliness by assessing in-home behavior using wireless motion and contact sensors, phone monitors, and computer software as well as algorithms developed to assess key behaviors of interest. We then present results showing the accuracy of the system in detecting loneliness in a longitudinal study of 16 older adults who agreed to have the sensor platform installed in their own homes for up to 8 months. We show that loneliness is significantly associated with both time out-of-home ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]) and number of computer sessions ([Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text]). [Formula: see text] for the model was 0.35. We also show the model's ability to predict out-of-sample loneliness, demonstrating that the correlation between true loneliness and predicted out-of-sample loneliness is 0.48. When compared with the University of California at Los Angeles loneliness score, the normalized mean absolute error of the predicted loneliness scores was 0.81 and the normalized root mean squared error was 0.91. These results represent first steps toward an unobtrusive, objective method for the prediction of loneliness among older adults, and mark the first time multiple objective behavioral measures that have been related to this key health outcome.

Indexed as

ambient assessmentIn-home monitoringlonelinesslongitudinal modelsolder adults

Identifiers

PMID27574577
PMCPMC4993148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.