Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27574572›Full record

ReviewNeurology. Clinical practice2016

Considerations in the development of generic disease therapies for multiple sclerosis.

Le H Hua, Jeffrey A Cohen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurology. Clinical practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Le H HuaLou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (LHH), Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV; and Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (JAC), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Jeffrey A CohenLou Ruvo Center for Brain Health (LHH), Cleveland Clinic, Las Vegas, NV; and Mellen Center for Multiple Sclerosis Treatment and Research (JAC), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Cleveland Clinic · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewMedication prices are a major contributor to the high cost of care for multiple sclerosis (MS). The patents for some of the initial injectable therapies for relapsing MS recently expired, permitting development, regulatory approval, and marketing of generic alternatives with the potential for lower prices and cost savings to payers and patients. RECENT

findingsA generic version of glatiramer acetate 20 mg administered by daily subcutaneous injection recently received regulatory approval in the United States. Two additional generic versions of glatiramer acetate have been submitted for regulatory review. The development and testing of generic disease-modifying therapies for MS such as glatiramer acetate, which are complex molecules, present several complicating factors. SUMMARY: This article provides background on the development of generics and reviews the status of generic glatiramer acetate.

Identifiers

PMID27574572
PMCPMC4987120
OpenAlexW2471246819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.