ArticleMicroscopy today2016
Use of XPS to Quantify Thickness of Coatings on Nanoparticles.
Article in Microscopy today, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Growth and interface formation in CeONanoscale advances · 2026Article
- Enhanced ion intercalation in NiChemical science · 2025Article
- Spectroscopic Methods Used in Implant Material Studies.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Practical Guides for X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS): First Steps in planning, conducting and reporting XPS measurements.Journal of vacuum science & technology. A, Vacuum, surfaces, and films : an official journal of the American Vacuum Society · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
XPS and other surface sensitive methods are being increasingly used to extract quantitative information about organic and inorganic coatings and contamination on nanoparticles. The extraction of coating thickness requires information about particle diameter from other measurements, such as electron microscopy, combined with a model that includes the physical processes associated with XPS. Advantages of using XPS include the sensitivity to very thin coatings (or surface contamination) and the ability to extract important information about organic layers. Single particle information from electron microsocpy combined with XPS sensitivity in determining composition make a powerful combination for nanoparticle anlaysis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.