Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27574417›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2016

General practitioners' perceptions of COPD treatment: thematic analysis of qualitative interviews.

Katrine Rutkær Molin, Ingrid Egerod, Laura Staun Valentiner, Peter Lange, Henning Langberg

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Ethical Dilemmas in Physicians' Consultations with COPD Patients.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2022
    Article
  13. Chronic condition clusters and associated disability over time.Journal of multimorbidity and comorbidity · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Katrine Rutkær MolinCopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Ingrid EgerodDepartment of Neuroanaesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laura Staun ValentinerCopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Peter LangeSection of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henning LangbergCopenRehab, Section of Social Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Denmark, the treatment of COPD is mainly managed by general practitioners (GPs). Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is available to patients with COPD in the local community by GP referral, but in practice, many patients do not participate in rehabilitation. The aim of our study was to explore 1) GPs' perceptions of their role and responsibility in the rehabilitation of patients with COPD, and 2) GPs' perceptions of how patients manage their COPD.

methodsThe study was based on a qualitative design with semi-structured key-informant interviews with GPs. Investigator triangulation was applied during data generation, and analysis was done using thematic analysis methodology.

resultsOur main findings were that GPs relied on patients themselves to take the initiative to make clinic appointments and on professionals at health centers to provide the PR including consultations on lifestyle changes. The GPs experienced that patients chose to come to the clinic when they were in distress and that patients either declined or had poor adherence to rehabilitation when offered. The GPs were relieved that the health centers had taken over the responsibility of rehabilitation as GPs lacked the resources to discuss rehabilitation and follow up on individual plans.

conclusionOur study suggested a potential self-reinforcing problem with the treatment of COPD being mainly focused on medication rather than on PR. Neither GPs nor patients used a proactive approach. Further, GPs were not fully committed to discuss non-pharmacological treatment and perceived the patients as unmotivated for PR. As such, there is a need for optimizing non-pharmacological treatment of COPD and in particular the referral process to PR.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePerceptionRespiratory TherapyCommunicationDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedDenmarkFemaleGeneral PractitionersHumansInterviews as TopicMalePatient CompliancePhysician-Patient RelationsPhysician's Rolemotivation theorynon-pharmacological treatmentprimary carepulmonary rehabilitationqualitative researchtreatment approach

Identifiers

PMID27574417
PMCPMC4994802

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.