Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27574396›Full record

ReviewClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Ab interno trabeculectomy: patient selection and perspectives.

Kateki Vinod, Steven J Gedde

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02964676 (Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery on Chinese Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02964676 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery on Chinese Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma

TypeinterventionalSponsorShanghai Eye Disease Prevention and Treatment CenterRan2017 to 2019Enrolled246ConditionsGlaucoma, Angle-ClosureArmsab interno trabeculectomy with Trabectome, trabeculectomy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Which Patients Would Most Likely to Benefit: MIGS or MEGS, Which One Is It?Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kateki VinodBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
Steven J GeddeBascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
University of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ab interno trabeculectomy is one among several recently introduced minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries that avoid a conjunctival incision and full-thickness sclerostomy involved in traditional glaucoma surgery. Ablation of the trabecular meshwork and inner wall of Schlemm's canal is performed in an arcuate fashion via a clear corneal incision, alone or in combination with phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Intraocular pressure reduction following ab interno trabeculectomy is limited by resistance in distal outflow pathways and generally stabilizes in the mid-to-high teens. Relief of medication burden has been demonstrated by some studies. A very low rate of complications, most commonly transient hyphema and intraocular pressure elevations in the immediate postoperative period, have been reported. However, available data are derived from small retrospective and prospective case series. Randomized, controlled trials are needed to better elucidate the potential merits of ab interno trabeculectomy in the combined setting versus phacoemulsification cataract surgery alone and to compare it with other minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries.

Indexed as

ab interno trabeculectomyglaucomaintraocular pressureminimally invasive glaucoma surgerysurgical outcomes

Identifiers

PMID27574396
PMCPMC4993406
OpenAlexW2514623300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.