Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27574393›Full record

ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2016

Direct ophthalmoscopy on YouTube: analysis of instructional YouTube videos' content and approach to visualization.

Nanna Jo Borgersen, Mikael Johannes Vuokko Henriksen, Lars Konge, Torben Lykke Sørensen, Ann Sofia Skou Thomsen, Yousif Subhi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Nanna Jo BorgersenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, the Capital Region of Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Mikael Johannes Vuokko HenriksenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, the Capital Region of Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Lars KongeCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, the Capital Region of Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Torben Lykke SørensenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
Ann Sofia Skou ThomsenCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, the Capital Region of Denmark; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen; Department of Ophthalmology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Yousif SubhiDepartment of Ophthalmology, Zealand University Hospital, Roskilde; Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen.
University of Copenhagen · DKZealand University Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DKCopenhagen University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDirect ophthalmoscopy is well-suited for video-based instruction, particularly if the videos enable the student to see what the examiner sees when performing direct ophthalmoscopy. We evaluated the pedagogical effectiveness of instructional YouTube videos on direct ophthalmoscopy by evaluating their content and approach to visualization.

methodsIn order to synthesize main themes and points for direct ophthalmoscopy, we formed a broad panel consisting of a medical student, junior and senior physicians, and took into consideration book chapters targeting medical students and physicians in general. We then systematically searched YouTube. Two authors reviewed eligible videos to assess eligibility and extract data on video statistics, content, and approach to visualization. Correlations between video statistics and contents were investigated using two-tailed Spearman's correlation.

resultsWe screened 7,640 videos, of which 27 were found eligible for this study. Overall, a median of 12 out of 18 points (interquartile range: 8-14 key points) were covered; no videos covered all of the 18 points assessed. We found the most difficulties in the approach to visualization of how to approach the patient and how to examine the fundus. Time spent on fundus examination correlated with the number of views per week (Spearman's ρ=0.53; P=0.029).

conclusionVideos may help overcome the pedagogical issues in teaching direct ophthalmoscopy; however, the few available videos on YouTube fail to address this particular issue adequately. There is a need for high-quality videos that include relevant points, provide realistic visualization of the examiner's view, and give particular emphasis on fundus examination.

Indexed as

direct ophthalmoscopyinstructional videosophthalmology educationophthalmoscopeYouTube

Identifiers

PMID27574393
PMCPMC4993418
OpenAlexW2515104264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.