Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27573657›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016

How Does Caregiver Well-Being Relate to Perceived Quality of Care in Patients With Cancer? Exploring Associations and Pathways.

Kristin Litzelman, Erin E Kent, Michelle Mollica, Julia H Rowland

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 83 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
83citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

83 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 136 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quality of life and burden in family caregivers of advanced cancer patients in the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg: results from a single-centre study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

23 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kristin LitzelmanKristin Litzelman, University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI; Erin E. Kent, Michelle Mollica, and Julia H. Rowland, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Erin E KentKristin Litzelman, University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI; Erin E. Kent, Michelle Mollica, and Julia H. Rowland, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Michelle MollicaKristin Litzelman, University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI; Erin E. Kent, Michelle Mollica, and Julia H. Rowland, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
Julia H RowlandKristin Litzelman, University of Wisconsin-Madison and University of Wisconsin-Extension, Madison, WI; Erin E. Kent, Michelle Mollica, and Julia H. Rowland, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
University of Wisconsin–Madison · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

PROPENSITY SCORES IN HIERARCHICAL MODELSU01CA093344 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z., FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2011
$19.5M
Lung/Colon Cancer Outcomes--Cancer Research NetworkU01CA093332 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI WEEKS, JANE C. · 2001 to 2008
$7.4M
RAND-UCLA CanCORS PDCR ApplicationU01CA093348 · NCI · RAND CORPORATION · PI KAHN, KATHERINE LESLIE · 2001 to 2008
$7.3M
Cancer Care Outcomes Research &Surveillance ConsortiumU01CA093324 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI AYANIAN, JOHN Z. · 2001 to 2008
$7.1M
RACIAL DISPARITIES IN END OF LIFE CARE--ACCESSU01CA093329 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI FOUAD, MONA N. · 2001 to 2008
$6.6M
NC Colorectal Cancer Care Outcomes Research StudyU01CA093326 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SANDLER, ROBERT S. · 2001 to 2008
$4.3M
Lung Cancer Care Outcomes/Surveillance Consortium-IowaU01CA093339 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI WALLACE, ROBERT BRUCE · 2001 to 2008
$3.7M
NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093324NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093326NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093329NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093332NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093339NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093344NCI NIH HHS U01 CA093348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose Perceived quality of care (QOC) is an increasingly important metric of care quality and can be affected by such factors among patients with cancer as quality of life and physician trust. This study sought to evaluate whether informal caregiver well-being was also associated with perceived QOC among patients with cancer and assessed potential pathways that link these factors. Methods This study used data from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) consortium. Patients with lung and colorectal cancer enrolled in CanCORS (N = 689) nominated an informal caregiver to participate in a caregiving survey. Both groups self-reported sociodemographic, psychosocial, and caregiving characteristics; cancer characteristics were obtained from the CanCORS core data set. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between caregiver psychosocial factors and subsequent patient-perceived QOC, controlling for earlier patient-perceived QOC and covariates. Secondary analysis examined potential pathways that link these factors. Results Patients whose informal caregiver had higher levels of depressive symptoms were significantly more likely to report fair or poor QOC (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.13). When caregivers reported fair or poor self-rated health, patients were more than three times more likely to report fair or poor perceived QOC (odds ratio, 3.76; 95% CI, 1.76 to 9.55). Controlling for patient psychosocial factors and physician communication and coordination of medical care reduced the effect size and/or statistical significance of these relationships. Conclusion Informal caregivers are an important part of the care team and their well-being is associated with patient-perceived QOC. Engaging informal cancer caregivers as part of the care team and conducting ongoing risk stratification screening and intervention to optimize their health may improve patient-reported outcomes and QOC.

Indexed as

Health StatusQuality of Health CareAdultAgedCaregiversColorectal NeoplasmsDepressionFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID27573657
PMCPMC5074348
OpenAlexW2514499626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.