ArticleObesity surgery2016
Endoscopic Management of Vertical Banded Gastroplasty Stricture: Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy.
Article in Obesity surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endoscopic Removal of Non-Eroding Gastric Bands Post Silastic Ring Vertical Gastroplasty Using Lumen-Apposing Metal Stents-a Case Series.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Outcomes of stepwise treatment of food intolerance secondary to vertical banded gastroplasty.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Difficult to Pass: Cholangitis With Vertical Band Stenosis.ACG case reports journal · 2024Article
- A novel approach to the removal of a silastic band via the peroral endoscopic tunneling-silastic bandectomy technique.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2022Article
- Three-Port Laparoscopic Transgastric Revision of a Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: Case Report and Literature Review.Obesity surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) is no longer performed in the USA, due to its popularity in 1980s, many patients still possess this anatomy with its inherent complications. The stomal stenosis secondary to tight ring or mesh is traditionally treated with surgical removal of the silastic ring or a complex revision, which was hampered by complications, technical complexity, and invasiveness. We described our experience of endoscopic management of this complex problem and the early outcomes.
designRetrospective study.
settingTertiary care center. PATIENTS: Thirteen consecutive patients with gastric outlet obstruction who underwent endoscopic intervention after vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG).
interventionEndoscopic removal of silastic ring with self-expanding metal stent or endoscopic guided trans-gastric stapled stricturoplasty (TSS). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endoscopic approaches.
resultsTechnical and clinical success in 11 patients (85 %) on first endoscopic attempt. Stent migrated in one patient, and another patient required second endoscopic intervention for recurring symptoms. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective analysis, single-institution study, and small sample size.
conclusionEndoscopic approach to gastric outlet obstruction secondary to VBG regardless of type of restrictive device is safe and feasible with possible short-term benefit. This technique may also be use as bridge toward future revision surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.