Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27573380›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2016

Hypofractionation with no boost after breast conservation in early-stage breast cancer patients.

Francesca Arcadipane, Pierfrancesco Franco, Chiara De Colle, Nadia Rondi, Jacopo Di Muzio, Emanuela Pelle, Stefania Martini, Ada Ala, Mario Airoldi, Michela Donadio and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Francesca ArcadipaneDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Pierfrancesco FrancoDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy. pierfrancesco.franco@unito.it.
Chiara De ColleDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Nadia RondiDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Jacopo Di MuzioDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Emanuela PelleDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Stefania MartiniDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Ada AlaDepartment of General and Specialistic Surgery, Breast Surgery Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Mario AiroldiDepartment of Oncology, Medical Oncology 2, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Michela DonadioDepartment of Oncology, Breast Oncology Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Corrado De SanctisDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy.
Isabella CastellanoDepartment of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Torino, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo RagonaDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Umberto RicardiDepartment of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate local control, survival and toxicity profile of a consecutive cohort of early-stage breast cancer (EBC) patients treated with adjuvant hypofractionated radiotherapy (HF) with no boost delivered to the lumpectomy cavity, after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Between 2005 and 2015, a total of 493 women affected with EBC were treated with HF (46 Gy/20 fractions or 40.05 Gy/15 fractions) to the whole breast without boost to tumor bed, because of age and/or favorable tumor characteristics. The primary endpoint was 5-year actuarial local control (LC); secondary endpoints included survival, toxicity profile and cosmesis. Median follow-up was 57 months (range 6-124). Actuarial 5-year overall, cancer-specific, disease-free survival and LC were 96.3, 98.9, 97.8 and 98.6 %, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor stage (T1 vs. T2) and hormonal status (positive vs. negative estrogen receptors) were significantly correlated with LC. Only 2 % of patients experienced ≥G3 acute skin toxicity. Late toxicity was mild with only 1 case of G3 fibrosis. Most of the patients (95 %) had good-excellent cosmetic results. HF to the whole breast with no boost delivered to the tumor bed is a safe and effective option for a population of low-risk breast cancer patients after BCS, with excellent 5-year LC, mild toxicity profile and promising cosmetic outcome. A subgroup of patients with larger tumors and/or with no estrogen receptor expression may potentially benefit from treatment intensification with a boost dose to the lumpectomy cavity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMastectomy, SegmentalMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiotherapy, AdjuvantRetrospective StudiesAdjuvant therapyBoostBreast cancerHypofractionated radiotherapyHypofractionationLocal control

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.