Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27573374›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2016

Evolution to the rescue: using comparative genomics to understand long non-coding RNAs.

Igor Ulitsky

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 299 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
299citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

299 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. LncRNAEpigenetics · 2026
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Direct roles of long non-coding RNAs in transcription activation.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2026
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Remodeling ofScience advances · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

239 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Igor UlitskyDepartment of Biological Regulation, Weizmann Institute of Science, 234 Herzl Street, Rehovot 76100, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged in recent years as major players in a multitude of pathways across species, but it remains challenging to understand which of them are important and how their functions are performed. Comparative sequence analysis has been instrumental for studying proteins and small RNAs, but the rapid evolution of lncRNAs poses new challenges that demand new approaches. Here, I review the lessons learned so far from genome-wide mapping and comparisons of lncRNAs across different species. I also discuss how comparative analyses can help us to understand lncRNA function and provide practical considerations for examining functional conservation of lncRNA genes.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAnimalsGenomicsHumansMolecular Sequence AnnotationRNA, Long NoncodingSequence Analysis, RNATranscriptomeRNA, Long Noncoding

Identifiers

PMID27573374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.