Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27573042›Full record

ArticleNetherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation2016

Reduced number of cardiovascular events and increased cost-effectiveness by genotype-guided antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions in the Netherlands.

B A L M Deiman, P A L Tonino, K Kouhestani, C E M Schrover, V Scharnhorst, L R C Dekker, N H J Pijls

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Systematic review of the evidence on the cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenomics-guided treatment for cardiovascular diseases.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genetic Determinants of Response to P2YInterventional cardiology clinics · 2024
    Review
  13. Genotype-Guided Antiplatelet Therapy: JACC Review Topic of the Week.Journal of the American College of Cardiology · 2024
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Pharmacogenetics of P2YPharmacotherapy · 2023
    Review
  16. Pharmacogenetics of Antiplatelet Therapy.Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology · 2023
    Review
  17. Review
  18. A Review of the Role of the Antiplatelet Drug Ticagrelor in the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Thrombotic Disease, and Other Diseases.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2022
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Evaluation of race and ethnicity disparities in outcome studies ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

B A L M DeimanClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands. birgit.deiman@catharinaziekenhuis.nl.
P A L ToninoDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
K KouhestaniDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
C E M SchroverClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
V ScharnhorstClinical Laboratory, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
L R C DekkerDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
N H J PijlsDepartment of Cardiology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Catharina Ziekenhuis · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study explores clinical outcome in cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19)-related poor metaboliser patients treated with either clopidogrel or prasugrel after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and investigates whether this could be cost-effective. METHODS AND

resultsThis single-centre, observational study included 3260 patients scheduled for elective PCI between October 2010 and June 2013 and followed for adverse cardiovascular events until October 2014. Post PCI, CYP2C19 poor metaboliser patients were treated with clopidogrel or prasugrel, in addition to aspirin. In total, 32 poor metabolisers were treated with clopidogrel and 41 with prasugrel. The number of adverse cardiovascular events, defined as death from cardiovascular cause, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, every second visit to the catheterisation room for re-PCI in the same artery, or stroke, within 1.5 years of PCI, was significantly higher in the CYP2C19 poor metaboliser group treated with clopidogrel (n = 10, 31 %) compared with the poor metaboliser group treated with prasugrel (n = 2, 5 %) (p = 0.003). Costs per gained quality-adjusted life years (QALY) were estimated, showing that genotype-guided post-PCI treatment with prasugrel could be cost-effective with less than € 10,000 per gained QALY.

conclusionThis study provides evidence that for CYP2C19-related poor metabolisers prasugrel may be more effective than clopidogrel to prevent major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI and this approach could be cost-effective.

Indexed as

ClopidogrelCost-effectivenessCYP2C19PrasugrelStent thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID27573042
PMCPMC5039130
OpenAlexW2513072880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.