ArticleEuropean radiology2017
Usage of structured reporting in radiological practice: results from an Italian online survey.
Article in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06877182 (Novel Neuroradiological Workflow for the Assisted DIAgnosis and Management of DEMentia with Artificial Intelligence), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Novel Neuroradiological Workflow for the Assisted DIAgnosis and Management of DEMentia with Artificial Intelligence
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary attitudes towards LLM-structured oncologic CT reports: a prospective fixed-sequence questionnaire study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Leveraging large language models for information extraction from free-text liver MRI reports and assessment of clinical utility: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Structured reporting in knee MRI.Skeletal radiology · 2026Review
- Can chatGPT-4o reliably standardize PSMA PET/CT and PET/MRI reports using PROMISE V2 criteria? - An exploratory study.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Context-Aware Prompting Techniques for Classification of Tumor Response Categories in Radiology Reports Using Large Language Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Decoding collaboration obstacles: a survey on reporting preferences between neuroradiologists and clinical specialists.Insights into imaging · 2026Article
- Proposal and clinical application of a structured standardized report for lumbosacral MRI integrated with a comprehensive grading system for lumbar stenosis.La Radiologia medica · 2026Article
- Use and Perceptions of Oncology CT Structured Reports in Australia and New Zealand.Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology · 2025Article
- Large language models for structured reporting in radiology: past, present, and future.European radiology · 2025Review
- Improving radiology reporting locally and globally: who, how, and why?The British journal of radiology · 2025Review
- Harnessing the power of structured reporting in oncology: overcoming barriers through multidisciplinary collaboration and digital innovation.European radiology · 2024Article
- Perceptions of radiologists on structured reporting for cancer imaging-a survey by the European Society of Oncologic Imaging (ESOI).European radiology · 2024Article
- Interpreting Prostate MRI Reports in the Era of Increasing Prostate MRI Utilization: A Urologist's Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Pre-TAVI imaging: an Italian survey by the CT PRotocol optimization (CT-PRO) group.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2024Article
- Assisted documentation as a new focus for artificial intelligence in endoscopy: the precedent of reliable withdrawal time and image reporting.Endoscopy · 2023Article
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of CT and MRI radiomics in ovarian cancer: methodological issues and clinical utility.Insights into imaging · 2023Review
- Implementation of structured reporting in clinical routine: a review of 7 years of institutional experience.Insights into imaging · 2023Article
- Exploring Radiologists' Burnout in the COVID-19 Era: A Narrative Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Eye-tracking differences between free text and template radiology reports: a pilot study.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2023Article
- Structured Reporting in Radiological Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the opinion on structured reporting (SR) and its usage by radiologist members of the Italian Society of Medical Radiology (SIRM) via an online survey.
methodsAll members received an email invitation to join the survey as an initiative by the SIRM Imaging Informatics Chapter. The survey included 10 questions about demographic information, definition of radiological SR, its usage in everyday practice, perceived advantages and disadvantages over conventional reporting and overall opinion about SR.
results1159 SIRM members participated in the survey. 40.3 % of respondents gave a correct definition of radiological SR, but as many as 56 % of them never used it at work. Compared with conventional reporting, the most appreciated advantages of SR were higher reproducibility (70.5 %), better interaction with referring clinicians (58.3 %) and the option to link metadata (36.7 %). Risk of excessive simplification (59.8 %), template rigidity (56.1 %) and poor user compliance (42.1 %) were the most significant disadvantages. Overall, most respondents (87.0 %) were in favour of the adoption of radiological SR.
conclusionsMost radiologists were interested in radiological SR and in favour of its adoption. However, concerns about semantic, technical and professional issues limited its diffusion in real working life, encouraging efforts towards improved SR standardisation and engineering. KEY POINTS: • Despite radiologists' awareness, radiological SR is little used in working practice. • Perceived SR advantages are reproducibility, better clinico-radiological interaction and link to metadata. • Perceived SR disadvantages are excessive simplification, template rigidity and poor user compliance. • Improved standardisation and engineering may be helpful to boost SR diffusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
27572812What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.