Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27572627›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2016

Effects of sertraline, duloxetine, vortioxetine, and idazoxan in the rat affective bias test.

Louise K Refsgaard, Kia Haubro, Darryl S Pickering, Sarah A Stuart, Emma S J Robinson, Jesper T Andreasen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rat models of reward deficits in psychiatric disorders.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Louise K RefsgaardDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kia HaubroDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Darryl S PickeringDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sarah A StuartSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, UK.
Emma S J RobinsonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology and Neuroscience, University of Bristol, University Walk, Bristol, UK.
Jesper T AndreasenDepartment of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. jta@sund.ku.dk.
University of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L011212/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleAffective biases seemingly play a crucial role for the onset and development of depression. Acute treatment with monoamine-based antidepressants positively influences emotional processing, and an early correction of biases likely results in repeated positive experiences that ultimately lead to improved mood.

objectivesUsing two conventional antidepressants, sertraline and duloxetine, we aimed to forward the characterization of a newly developed affective bias test (ABT) for rats. Further, we examined the effect of vortioxetine, a recently approved antidepressant, and the α

methodsSprague Dawley rats were tested in an affective bias test using a fully balanced within-subject study design. Rats learned to associate two different digging substrates with a reward during six reward-pairing days. The absolute value of the rewards was identical, but the affective state at the time of learning induces a positive or negative bias towards the treatment-paired digging substrate at recall. The choice bias between the two digging substrates at recall represents the affective bias. Sertraline (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg), duloxetine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg), vortioxetine (1, 3 and 10 mg/kg) and idazoxan (3 and 10 mg/kg) were tested in the ABT. RESULTS AND

conclusionsAll four drugs, regardless of their mechanism of action, induced a positive affective bias in the ABT, although the overall effect of treatment was not statistically significant for sertraline and duloxetine. The largest effects were induced by vortioxetine and idazoxan, both of which caused significant positive biases at all tested doses.

Indexed as

Adrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AntagonistsAffectAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsBehavior, AnimalDuloxetine HydrochlorideIdazoxanMalePiperazinesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyRewardSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSertralineSulfidesVortioxetineAdrenergic alpha-2 Receptor AntagonistsAntidepressive AgentsDuloxetine HydrochlorideIdazoxanPiperazinesSelective Serotonin Reuptake InhibitorsSertralineSulfidesVortioxetineAffective biasAntidepressantCognitionDepressionEmotional processing

Identifiers

PMID27572627
OpenAlexW2509176371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.