Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27571255›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Breast Contrast Enhanced MR Imaging: Semi-Automatic Detection of Vascular Map and Predominant Feeding Vessel.

Antonella Petrillo, Roberta Fusco, Salvatore Filice, Vincenza Granata, Orlando Catalano, Paolo Vallone, Maurizio Di Bonito, Massimiliano D'Aiuto, Massimo Rinaldo, Immacolata Capasso and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Automated vascular analysis of breast thermograms with interpretable features.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Antonella PetrilloDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, radiant and metabolic Therapy, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Roberta FuscoDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, radiant and metabolic Therapy, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Salvatore FiliceDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, radiant and metabolic Therapy, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Vincenza GranataDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, radiant and metabolic Therapy, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Orlando CatalanoDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, radiant and metabolic Therapy, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Paolo ValloneDivision of Radiology, Department of Diagnostic Imaging, radiant and metabolic Therapy, "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Maurizio Di BonitoDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Department of Diagnostic and Laboratory Pathology "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Massimiliano D'AiutoDivison of Senology Surgery, Department of Senology "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Massimo RinaldoDivison of Senology Surgery, Department of Senology "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Immacolata CapassoDivison of Senology Surgery, Department of Senology "Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale-IRCCS", Via Mariano Semmola, Naples, Italy.
Mario SansoneDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Information Technologies, University "Federico II" of Naples, Via Claudio, Naples, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo obtain breast vascular map and to assess correlation between predominant feeding vessel and tumor location with a semi-automatic method compared to conventional radiologic reading.

methods148 malignant and 75 benign breast lesions were included. All patients underwent bilateral MR imaging. Written informed consent was obtained from the patients before MRI. The local ethics committee granted approval for this study. Semi-automatic breast vascular map and predominant vessel detection was performed on MRI, for each patient. Semi-automatic detection (depending on grey levels threshold manually chosen by radiologist) was compared with results of two expert radiologists; inter-observer variability and reliability of semi-automatic approach were assessed.

resultsAnatomic analysis of breast lesions revealed that 20% of patients had masses in internal half, 50% in external half and the 30% in subareolar/central area. As regards the 44 tumors in internal half, based on radiologic consensus, 40 demonstrated a predominant feeding vessel (61% were supplied by internal thoracic vessels, 14% by lateral thoracic vessels, 16% by both thoracic vessels and 9% had no predominant feeding vessel-p<0.01), based on semi-automatic detection, 38 tumors demonstrated a predominant feeding vessel (66% were supplied by internal thoracic vessels, 11% by lateral thoracic vessels, 9% by both thoracic vessels and 14% had no predominant feeding vessel-p<0.01). As regards the 111 tumors in external half, based on radiologic consensus, 91 demonstrated a predominant feeding vessel (25% were supplied by internal thoracic vessels, 39% by lateral thoracic vessels, 18% by both thoracic vessels and 18% had no predominant feeding vessel-p<0.01), based on semi-automatic detection, 94 demonstrated a predominant feeding vessel (27% were supplied by internal thoracic vessels, 45% by lateral thoracic vessels, 4% by both thoracic vessels and 24% had no predominant feeding vessel-p<0.01). An excellent agreement between two radiologic assessments (k = 0.81) and between radiologic consensus and semi-automatic assessment (k = 0.80) was found to identify origin of predominant feeding vessel. An excellent reliability for semi-automatic assessment (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96) was reported.

conclusionsPredominant feeding vessel location was correlated with breast lesion location: internal thoracic artery supplied the highest proportion of breasts with tumor in internal half and lateral thoracic artery supplied the highest proportion of breasts with lateral tumor.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAlgorithmsBreastBreast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27571255
PMCPMC5003359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.