Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27571063›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2016

In Vitro Co-Culture Models of Breast Cancer Metastatic Progression towards Bone.

Chiara Arrigoni, Simone Bersini, Mara Gilardi, Matteo Moretti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting the Wnt signaling pathway for breast cancer bone metastasis therapy.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. A Three-DimensionalTissue engineering. Part C, Methods · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. 2D and 3D In Vitro Co-Culture for Cancer and Bone Cell Interaction Studies.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. 3d Tissue Engineered In Vitro Models Of Cancer In Bone.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Engineering the pre-metastatic niche.Nature biomedical engineering · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chiara ArrigoniCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, via Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy. chiara.arrigoni@grupposandonato.it.
Simone BersiniCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, via Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy. simone.bersini@grupposandonato.it.
Mara GilardiCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, via Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy. mara.gilardi@grupposandonato.it.
Matteo MorettiCell and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, via Galeazzi 4, 20161 Milano, Italy. matteo.moretti@grupposandonato.it.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITSwiss Institute for Regenerative Medicine · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced breast cancer frequently metastasizes to bone through a multistep process involving the detachment of cells from the primary tumor, their intravasation into the bloodstream, adhesion to the endothelium and extravasation into the bone, culminating with the establishment of a vicious cycle causing extensive bone lysis. In recent years, the crosstalk between tumor cells and secondary organs microenvironment is gaining much attention, being indicated as a crucial aspect in all metastatic steps. To investigate the complex interrelation between the tumor and the microenvironment, both in vitro and in vivo models have been exploited. In vitro models have some advantages over in vivo, mainly the possibility to thoroughly dissect in controlled conditions and with only human cells the cellular and molecular mechanisms underlying the metastatic progression. In this article we will review the main results deriving from in vitro co-culture models, describing mechanisms activated in the crosstalk between breast cancer and bone cells which drive the different metastatic steps.

Indexed as

AnimalsBone NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCoculture TechniquesDisease ProgressionFemaleHumansbone metastasisbreast carcinomaco-culturein vitro models

Identifiers

PMID27571063
PMCPMC5037685
OpenAlexW2513629352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.