Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27571058›Full record

ReviewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland)2016

Cardiac Meets Skeletal: What's New in Microfluidic Models for Muscle Tissue Engineering.

Roberta Visone, Mara Gilardi, Anna Marsano, Marco Rasponi, Simone Bersini, Matteo Moretti

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Will microfluidics enable functionally integrated biohybrid robots?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Roberta VisoneDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy. roberta.visone@polimi.it.
Mara GilardiCell and Tissue Engineering Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano 20161, Italy. mara.gilardi@grupposandonato.it.
Anna MarsanoDepartments of Surgery and Biomedicine, University Basel, University Hospital Basel, Basel 4065, Switzerland. anna.marsano@usb.ch.
Marco RasponiDepartment of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano 20133, Italy. marco.rasponi@polimi.it.
Simone BersiniCell and Tissue Engineering Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano 20161, Italy. simone.bersini@grupposandonato.it.
Matteo MorettiCell and Tissue Engineering Lab, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milano 20161, Italy. matteo.moretti@grupposandonato.it.
Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi · ITPolitecnico di Milano · ITSwiss Institute for Regenerative Medicine · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last few years microfluidics and microfabrication technique principles have been extensively exploited for biomedical applications. In this framework, organs-on-a-chip represent promising tools to reproduce key features of functional tissue units within microscale culture chambers. These systems offer the possibility to investigate the effects of biochemical, mechanical, and electrical stimulations, which are usually applied to enhance the functionality of the engineered tissues. Since the functionality of muscle tissues relies on the 3D organization and on the perfect coupling between electrochemical stimulation and mechanical contraction, great efforts have been devoted to generate biomimetic skeletal and cardiac systems to allow high-throughput pathophysiological studies and drug screening. This review critically analyzes microfluidic platforms that were designed for skeletal and cardiac muscle tissue engineering. Our aim is to highlight which specific features of the engineered systems promoted a typical reorganization of the engineered construct and to discuss how promising design solutions exploited for skeletal muscle models could be applied to improve cardiac tissue models and vice versa.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesModels, BiologicalAnimalsHumansMuscle, SkeletalMyocardiumTissue Engineeringcardiac muscleelectrical stimulationheartin vitro 3D modelmechanical stimulationmicrofluidicorgan-on-a-chipskeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID27571058
PMCPMC6274098
OpenAlexW2512267190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.