Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570826›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Type II Cochlear Ganglion Neurons Do Not Drive the Olivocochlear Reflex: Re-Examination of the Cochlear Phenotype in Peripherin Knock-Out Mice.

Stéphane Maison, Leslie D Liberman, M Charles Liberman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ATP-gated P2x7 receptors express at type II auditory nerves and required for efferent hearing control and noise protection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. ISL1 is necessary for auditory neuron development and contributes toward tonotopic organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Developmental Changes inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  12. Deletion ofFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Talking back: Development of the olivocochlear efferent system.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Developmental biology · 2018
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stéphane MaisonDepartment of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-3096.ORCID 0000-0003-2813-6439
Leslie D LibermanEaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary , Boston, Massachusetts 02114-3096.ORCID 0000-0002-1973-1730
M Charles LibermanDepartment of Otology and Laryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; Eaton-Peabody Laboratories, Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts 02114-3096.ORCID 0000-0002-1973-1730
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · US

Funding

SINGLE-NEURON MARKING IN THE STUDY OF ABNORMAL COCHLEASR01DC000188 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Gabriel Corfas, M. Charles Liberman · 1989 to 2026
$15.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC000188
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cochlear nerve includes a small population of unmyelinated sensory fibers connecting outer hair cells to the brain. The functional role of these type II afferent neurons is controversial, because neurophysiological data are sparse. A recent study (Froud et al., 2015) reported that targeted deletion of peripherin, a type of neurofilament, eliminated type II afferents and inactivated efferent feedback to the outer hair cells, thereby suggesting that type II afferents were the sensory drive to this sound-evoked, negative-feedback reflex, the olivocochlear pathway. Here, we re-evaluated the cochlear phenotype in mice from the peripherin knock-out line and show that (1) type II afferent terminals are present in normal number and (2) olivocochlear suppression of cochlear responses is absent even when this efferent pathway is directly activated by shocks. We conclude that type II neurons are not the sensory drive for the efferent reflex and that peripherin deletion likely causes dysfunction of synaptic transmission between olivocochlear terminals and their peripheral targets.

Indexed as

AnimalsCochleaEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemFeedback, SensoryMice, KnockoutNeural PathwaysNeuronsOlivary NucleusOtoacoustic Emissions, SpontaneousPeripherinsReflexPeripherinsPrph protein, mousecochleafeedbackhair cellsolivocochlear reflexperipherin

Identifiers

PMID27570826
PMCPMC4987660
OpenAlexW2494656067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.