ArticleExpert opinion on orphan drugs
Ramucirumab for the treatment of gastroesophageal cancers.
Article in Expert opinion on orphan drugs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeting cell surface glucose-regulated protein 94 in gastric cancer with an anti-GRP94 human monoclonal antibody.BMB reports · 2024Article
- Molecular characteristics and multivariate survival analysis of 43 patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Article
- Ramucirumab combination with sorafenib enhances the inhibitory effect of sorafenib on HepG2 cancer cells.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionIn 2014, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved ramucirumab for use in the second line setting of advanced or metastatic, gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEAC) based on the result of Phase III clinical trials; REGARD and RAINBOW. AREAS COVERED: We briefly review the mechanisms of angiogenesis, anti-angiogenic therapy, and current status of advanced GEAC treatment then highlight the challenges and future prospects of novel molecular targeted agents. EXPERT OPINION: Although both the REGARD and RAINBOW trials met their primary endpoints of significantly prolonged overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the magnitude of the difference is still relatively modest. Given that ramucirumab alone has a marginal effect, a combination of paclitaxel and ramucirumab is strongly preferred as a second line therapy. To maximize the impact of ramucirumab in patients with GEAC, we can leverage the recent pharmacokinetics (PK) data of ramucirumab from the REGARD and RAINBOW trials. In addition, the quest for identifying biomarkers to select patients who are likely to benefit the most should continue. It is our firm belief that taxanes should no longer be added to the frontline regimens in most cases, given the success of the taxane/ramucirumab in the second line setting.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.