Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570660›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2016

My Cancer Genome: Evaluating an Educational Model to Introduce Patients and Caregivers to Precision Medicine Information.

Sheila V Kusnoor, Taneya Y Koonce, Mia A Levy, Christine M Lovly, Helen M Naylor, Ingrid A Anderson, Christine M Micheel, Sheau-Chiann Chen, Fei Ye, Nunzia B Giuse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Health Literacy Interventions in Cancer: a Systematic Review.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. All EGFR mutations are (not) created equal: focus on uncommon EGFR mutations.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sheila V KusnoorKnowledge Management, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;
Taneya Y KoonceKnowledge Management, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;
Mia A LevyDepartment of Biomedical Informatics & Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;
Christine M LovlyVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;; Departments of Medicine and Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Helen M NaylorKnowledge Management, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;
Ingrid A AndersonVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;
Christine M MicheelVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;; Departments of Medicine and Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Sheau-Chiann ChenCenter for Quantitative Sciences & Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Fei YeCenter for Quantitative Sciences & Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN; Department of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Nunzia B GiuseKnowledge Management, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;; Department of Biomedical Informatics & Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN;

Funding

The Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR)UL1TR000445 · NCATS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
Vanderbilt Clinical Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA090625 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Debra L. Friedman, Paula Jill Hurley · 2001 to 2026
$16.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000445NCI NIH HHS K12 CA090625
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study tested an innovative model for creating consumer-level content about precision medicine based on health literacy and learning style principles. "Knowledge pearl" videos, incorporating multiple learning modalities, were created to explain genetic and cancer medicine concepts. Cancer patients and caregivers (n=117) were randomized to view professional-level content directly from the My Cancer Genome (MCG) website (Group A; control), content from MCG with knowledge pearls embedded (Group B), or a consumer translation, targeted at the sixth grade level, with knowledge pearls embedded (Group C). A multivariate analysis showed that Group C, but not Group B, showed greater knowledge gains immediately after viewing the educational material than Group A. Statistically significant group differences in test performance were no longer observed three weeks later. These findings suggest that adherence to health literacy and learning style principles facilitates comprehension of precision medicine concepts and that ongoing review of the educational information is necessary.

Identifiers

PMID27570660
PMCPMC5001739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.