Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570656›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2016

A Quantitative and Qualitative Evaluation of Sentence Boundary Detection for the Clinical Domain.

Denis Griffis, Chaitanya Shivade, Eric Fosler-Lussier, Albert M Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. TAX-Corpus: Taxonomy based Annotations for Colonoscopy Evaluation.Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference) · 2022
    Article
  8. The h-ANN Model: Comprehensive Colonoscopy Concept Compilation Using Combined Contextual Embeddings.Biomedical engineering systems and technologies, international joint conference, BIOSTEC ... revised selected papers. BIOSTEC (Conference) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Hybrid Ensemble-Rule Algorithm for Improved MEDLINE® Sentence Boundary Detection.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Deep Neural Architectures for Discourse Segmentation in E-Mail Based Behavioral Interventions.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. CLAMP - a toolkit for efficiently building customized clinical natural language processing pipelines.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Denis GriffisDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering,; National Institutes of Health, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD.
Chaitanya ShivadeDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering.
Eric Fosler-LussierDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering.
Albert M LaiDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering,; Department of Biomedical Informatics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.; National Institutes of Health, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, Mark O. Hatfield Clinical Research Center, Bethesda, MD.

Funding

An Information Fusion Approach to Longitudinal Health RecordsR01LM011116 · NLM · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI LAI, ALBERT M · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sentence boundary detection (SBD) is a critical preprocessing task for many natural language processing (NLP) applications. However, there has been little work on evaluating how well existing methods for SBD perform in the clinical domain. We evaluate five popular off-the-shelf NLP toolkits on the task of SBD in various kinds of text using a diverse set of corpora, including the GENIA corpus of biomedical abstracts, a corpus of clinical notes used in the 2010 i2b2 shared task, and two general-domain corpora (the British National Corpus and Switchboard). We find that, with the exception of the cTAKES system, the toolkits we evaluate perform noticeably worse on clinical text than on general-domain text. We identify and discuss major classes of errors, and suggest directions for future work to improve SBD methods in the clinical domain. We also make the code used for SBD evaluation in this paper available for download at http://github.com/drgriffis/SBD-Evaluation.

Identifiers

PMID27570656
PMCPMC5001746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.