Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570580›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology2016

Sphingolipids in spinal cord injury.

Zachary B Jones, Yi Ren

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of physiology, pathophysiology and pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Trauma, Metabolomics, Outcomes, and Secrets of the Sphinx.Journal of the American College of Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Glycosphingolipids.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  9. MALDI Mass Spectrometry Imaging in a Primary Demyelination Model of Murine Spinal Cord.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Zachary B JonesDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State University Tallahassee, FL, USA.
Yi RenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Florida State UniversityTallahassee, FL, USA; Institute of Inflammation and Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityWenzhou, China.
Florida State University · USWenzhou Medical University · CN

Funding

Statistical Methods for Ultrahigh-dimensional Biomedical DataR01GM072611 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI CATTANEO, MATIAS DAMIAN · 2006 to 2021
$4.2M
Quantitative Methods for Genome-wide Analysis of Macrophage Activation by ESCsR01GM100474 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI FAN, JIANQING · 2011 to 2014
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM072611NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM100474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a debilitating condition that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Despite progress over the last few decades, the molecular mechanisms of secondary SCI that continue to occur days and weeks after the original trauma remain poorly understood. As a result, current therapies for SCI are only marginally effective. Sphingolipids, a diverse class of bioactive lipids, have been shown to regulate SCI repair and key secondary injury processes such as apoptosis, ischemia and inflammation. This review will discuss the numerous roles of sphingolipids and highlight the potential of sphingolipid-targeted therapies for SCI.

Indexed as

apoptosisceramideinflammationS1Psphingolipid metabolismSpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID27570580
PMCPMC4981650
OpenAlexW2518220854

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.