Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570545›Full record

ArticleDiabetology & metabolic syndrome2016

Early diabetes screening in women with previous gestational diabetes: a new insight.

Aline Nabuco, Samara Pimentel, Carolina A Cabizuca, Melanie Rodacki, Denise Finamore, Marcus M Oliveira, Lenita Zajdenverg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetology & metabolic syndrome, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Aline NabucoNutrology and Diabetes Section/Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-913 Brazil ; Serviço de Nutrologia e Diabetes, Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Rua Professor Rodolpho Paulo Rocco 255, sala 9E14, University City, CEP 21941-913 Brazil.
Samara PimentelNutrology and Diabetes Section/Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-913 Brazil.
Carolina A CabizucaNutrology and Diabetes Section/Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-913 Brazil.
Melanie RodackiNutrology and Diabetes Section/Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-913 Brazil.
Denise FinamoreMaternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Marcus M OliveiraNutrology and Diabetes Section/Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-913 Brazil.
Lenita ZajdenvergNutrology and Diabetes Section/Maternidade Escola, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro CEP 21941-913 Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus (DM). However, there is a low return rate for this screening, so it is important to search for earlier methods for evaluation after delivery, to increase the number of pregnant women screened, so you can start the treatment or prevention of these early comorbidities. To determine the accuracy of the 75 g 2-h oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) performed between 48-72 h after delivery for the diagnosis of DM using the OGTT after 6 weeks as the gold standard criterion, and to identify the optimal cutoff points for this exam for diabetes screening after a pregnancy complicated by GDM.

methods82 women with previous GDM underwent an OGTT between 48-72 h postpartum and repeated the test 6 weeks after delivery.

resultsThe prevalence of DM and prediabetes based on the first OGTT was 3.7 and 32.9 %, respectively, and 8.5 and 20.7 %, respectively, at the second OGTT. For those with DM, the area under the curve (AUC) based on the fasting plasma glucose (FPG) was 0.77 (95 % CI 0.61-0.92), and based on 2-h OGTT was 0.82 (95 % CI 0.66-0.97). For patients with prediabetes, the AUC based on the FPG was 0.73 (95 % CI 0.59-0.86) and based on the 2-h OGTT was 0.74 (95 % CI 0.61-0.87). Using a FPG cutoff value of 78 mg/dl (4.3 mmol/L) and a 2-h OGTT cutoff value of 130 mg/dl (7.2 mmol/L) for DM, the specificity was 58.7 and 60 %, the sensitivity was 71.4 and 85.7 %, the positive predictive value was 13.9 and 16.7 and the negative predictive value was 95.7 and 97.9 %, respectively.

conclusionsOGTT performed early in postpartum is a useful tool for identifying women with previous GDM who must perform an OGTT 6 weeks after delivery.

Indexed as

Gestational diabetes mellitusPostpartum screeningPuerperium

Identifiers

PMID27570545
PMCPMC5002139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.