Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570508›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2016

Data Citation in Neuroimaging: Proposed Best Practices for Data Identification and Attribution.

Leah B Honor, Christian Haselgrove, Jean A Frazier, David N Kennedy

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Searching Data: A Review of Observational Data Retrieval Practices in Selected Disciplines.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Data sharing in psychology.The American psychologist
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leah B HonorLamar Soutter Library, University of Massachusetts Medical School Worcester MA, USA.
Christian HaselgroveEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester MA, USA; Child and Adolescent NeuroDevelopment Initiative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester MA, USA.
Jean A FrazierEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester MA, USA; Child and Adolescent NeuroDevelopment Initiative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester MA, USA.
David N KennedyEunice Kennedy Shriver Center, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester MA, USA; Child and Adolescent NeuroDevelopment Initiative, Department of Psychiatry, University of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester MA, USA.

Funding

Resource DiscoveryP41EB019936 · NIBIB · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI David Nelson Kennedy · 2016 to 2026
$15.2M
Exposing the Deep Content of the Publication: Knowledge Extraction for Neuroimaging in Child PsychiatryR01MH083320 · NIMH · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI FRAZIER, JEAN A, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2009 to 2020
$6.3M
Neuroimaging Informatics Tools and Resources Clearinghouse Outreach, Infrastructure, and Content MaintenanceU24EB023398 · NIBIB · TCG, INC. · PI KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON, PREUSS, NINA · 2016 to 2018
$1.7M
NITRC Image Repository: A Commercial Solution to Advancing Data Sharing in NeuroscienceR44NS074540 · NINDS · TCG, INC. · PI BUCCIGROSSI, ROBERT, KENNEDY, DAVID NELSON · 2015 to 2017
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB019936NIBIB NIH HHS U24 EB023398NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083320NINDS NIH HHS R44 NS074540
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data sharing and reuse, while widely accepted as good ideas, have been slow to catch on in any concrete and consistent way. One major hurdle within the scientific community has been the lack of widely accepted standards for citing that data, making it difficult to track usage and measure impact. Within the neuroimaging community, there is a need for a way to not only clearly identify and cite datasets, but also to derive new aggregate sets from multiple sources while clearly maintaining lines of attribution. This work presents a functional prototype of a system to integrate Digital Object Identifiers (DOI) and a standardized metadata schema into a XNAT-based repository workflow, allowing for identification of data at both the project and image level. These item and source level identifiers allow any newly defined combination of images, from any number of projects, to be tagged with a new group-level DOI that automatically inherits the individual attributes and provenance information of its constituent parts. This system enables the tracking of data reuse down to the level of individual images. The implementation of this type of data identification system would impact researchers and data creators, data hosting facilities, and data publishers, but the benefit of having widely accepted standards for data identification and attribution would go far toward making data citation practical and advantageous.

Indexed as

creditdata attributiondata citationdata repositorydata sharing

Identifiers

PMID27570508
PMCPMC4981598

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.