Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27570390›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Indian Academy of Neurology

Report: Stem cell applications in neurological practice, an expert group consensus appraisal.

M Gourie Devi, Alka Sharma, Sujata Mohanty, Neeraj Jain, Kusum Verma, M Vasantha Padma, Pramod Pal, H S Chabbra, Satish Khadilkar, Sudesh Prabhakar and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

M Gourie DeviDepartment of Neurology, Institute of Human Behavior and Allied Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Alka SharmaDepartment of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi, India.
Sujata MohantyStem Cell Facility, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Neeraj JainNational Brain Research Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Kusum VermaDepartment of Pathology, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India.
M Vasantha PadmaDepartment of Neurology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Pramod PalDepartment of Neurology, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
H S ChabbraIndian Spinal Injuries Center, New Delhi, India.
Satish KhadilkarDepartment of Neurology, Grant Medical College and Sir JJ Group of Hospitals, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Sudesh PrabhakarDepartment of Neurology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Gagandeep SinghDepartment of Neurology, Dayanand Medical College, Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNeurologists in their clinical practice are faced with inquiries about the suitability of stem cell approaches by patients with a variety of acute and chronic (namely neurodegenerative) disorders. The challenge is to provide these patients with accurate information about the scope of stem cell use as well as at the same time, empowering patients with the capacity to make an autonomous decision regarding the use of stem cells.

methodsThe Indian Academy of Neurology commissioned an Expert Group Meeting to formulate an advisory to practicing neurologists to counsel patients seeking information and advice about stem cell approaches. RESULTS AND

conclusionsIn the course of such counselling, it should be emphasized that the information provided by many lay websites might be unsubstantiated. Besides, standard recommendations for the stem cell research, in particular, the application of several layers of oversight should be strictly adhered in order to ensure safety and ethical use of stem cells in neurological disorders.

Indexed as

Cerebellar ataxiasmotor neuron diseasemultiple sclerosismuscle disordersneurological disordersParkinson's diseasespinal cord injurystem cellsstroke

Identifiers

PMID27570390
PMCPMC4980961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.